From francisco@ncssm.edu Fri Sep 1 16:27:44 2000 Date: Fri, 1 Sep 2000 11:27:44 -0400 From: Francisco, Megan (was Beall) francisco@ncssm.edu Subject: NCSSM Graduation Date The following is an announcement concerning NCSSM graduation from our Executive Director, Dr. Gerald Boarman. Feel free to contact me with any questions, Megan Francisco, '95 Interim Head of Communications, NCSSM > -----Original Message----- > From: Boarman, Jerry > Sent: Friday, September 01, 2000 9:44 AM > To: _All Students; _All Staff > Subject: > > A number of students and staff have asked me to review the calendar > concerning the date for graduation. After receiving input from staff and > students as well as parents about travel schedules and work schedules for > relatives of our graduates we have decided to revert to the original > saturday graduation schedule. Please notify anyone who is a member of our > community or who has an interest in our graduation ceremony that > graduation will be on saturday, June 2, 2001. I hope everyone has a > wonderful extended holiday and I look forward to seeing you on tuesday. > > Dr. Boarman From makeamil@earthlink.net Wed Sep 13 15:41:34 2000 Date: Wed, 13 Sep 2000 10:41:34 -0400 (EDT) From: Wanda Thomas makeamil@earthlink.net Subject: (no subject) Please make sure to change my email address from makeamil@mindspring.com to make_a_mil@msn.com. Thanks From francisco@ncssm.edu Mon Sep 18 18:04:30 2000 Date: Mon, 18 Sep 2000 13:04:30 -0400 From: Francisco, Megan francisco@ncssm.edu Subject: Alumni Event - Washington This message is in MIME format. Since your mail reader does not understand this format, some or all of this message may not be legible. ------_=_NextPart_000_01C02192.82D1A7B6 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" There will be an alumni gathering in Washington, DC on Thursday, October 12. Click on the following link to find out more information. Classes of '85, '90, '95, hope to see you at the reunion this weekend. It's not too late to RSVP! See you soon, Megan Beall Francisco, '95 http://www.ncssm.edu/AlumniParents/ontheroad.html <> ------_=_NextPart_000_01C02192.82D1A7B6 Content-Type: application/octet-stream; name="Alumni & Parents at NCSSM.url" Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="Alumni & Parents at NCSSM.url" [DEFAULT] BASEURL=http://www.ncssm.edu/AlumniParents/ontheroad.html [InternetShortcut] URL=http://www.ncssm.edu/AlumniParents/ontheroad.html Modified=A032D0739221C00189 ------_=_NextPart_000_01C02192.82D1A7B6-- From portzer@ncssm.edu Mon Sep 18 19:58:06 2000 Date: Mon, 18 Sep 2000 14:58:06 -0400 From: Portzer, Jeremy portzer@ncssm.edu Subject: FW: Alt-Day talk by Dr. Orrin Pilkey FYI. -----Original Message----- From: Hugh Haskell [mailto:haskell@ncssm.edu] Sent: Monday, September 18, 2000 2:55 PM To: _All Staff Subject: Alt-Day talk by Dr. Orrin Pilkey On Friday morning at 11 AM, in the ETC Lecture Hall, the inaugural talk of the Faculty colloquium series for 2000/2001 will be given by Dr. Orrin Pilkey, Director of the Program for the Study of Developed Shorelines at Duke University. The title of his talk will be "A Global View of Barrier Islands, Restless Ribbons of Sand." Dr. Pilkey has been fighting the battle of the barrier islands of North Carolina for 30 years or more. He is an excellent speaker and this is a topic of substantial interest to North Carolinians. All members of the NCSSM family who are available are welcome to attend. Come help us make the 2000/2001 Faculty Colloquium series a rousing success. Thank you all in advance. Hugh Haskell From marc@certasaurus.com Mon Sep 18 21:20:33 2000 Date: Mon, 18 Sep 2000 20:20:33 +0000 (GMT) From: Marc Shannon marc@certasaurus.com Subject: SPAM from other alumni? Did anyone else receive a piece of mail (USPS, not e-mail) from Eric Phifer at Paine Webber? At first, I was kind of upset at having been spammed by another alumnus, but then as I thought about it, I was actually surprised that it hadn't happened before this. I suspect that alumni from other schools, especially business schools and other professional programs, probably get much more of this. One piece in sixteen years ain't that bad. Anyway, just thought I'd offer my two cents. Things have been pretty quiet on this list lately. --Marc From Catherine.Hardee@ncmail.net Mon Sep 18 20:27:18 2000 Date: Mon, 18 Sep 2000 15:27:18 -0400 From: Catherine Hardee Catherine.Hardee@ncmail.net Subject: SPAM from other alumni? This is a multi-part message in MIME format. --------------9A16FE89772503B6AC9CBC2A Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit I haven't received anything... Can people get our snail mail addresses from this e-mail list? (I'm not referring to the .vcf card my e-mail software attaches to these messages -- I'm referring to our actual home addresses.) Marc Shannon wrote: > Did anyone else receive a piece of mail (USPS, not e-mail) from Eric Phifer at > Paine Webber? > > At first, I was kind of upset at having been spammed by another alumnus, but > then as I thought about it, I was actually surprised that it hadn't happened > before this. I suspect that alumni from other schools, especially business > schools and other professional programs, probably get much more of this. One > piece in sixteen years ain't that bad. > > Anyway, just thought I'd offer my two cents. Things have been pretty quiet on > this list lately. > > --Marc > > _______________________________________________ > NCSSM Alumni Mailing List > alumni@ncssm.net > http://lists.ncssm.net/mailman/listinfo/alumni --------------9A16FE89772503B6AC9CBC2A Content-Type: text/x-vcard; charset=us-ascii; name="Catherine.Hardee.vcf" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Description: Card for Catherine Hardee Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="Catherine.Hardee.vcf" begin:vcard n:Hardee;Catherine C. tel;fax:(919) 715-3853 tel;work:(919) 715-7500 ext. 263 x-mozilla-html:TRUE org:NCDHHS -- Division of Early Intervention & Education version:2.1 email;internet:Catherine.Hardee@ncmail.net title:Benefits Representative adr;quoted-printable:;;2302 Mail Service Center=0D=0A;Raleigh;NC;27699-2302; fn:Catherine C. Hardee end:vcard --------------9A16FE89772503B6AC9CBC2A-- From edest@mse.ufl.edu Mon Sep 18 19:35:01 2000 Date: Mon, 18 Sep 2000 18:35:01 GMT From: edest@mse.ufl.edu edest@mse.ufl.edu Subject: upcoming reunion I would like to encourage alums of the classes '85, '90, & '95 (also 84/86, 89/91, & 94/96) who are in the Durham area to attend our upcoming reunion. It isn't too late to RSVP! Elizabeth 'Schultz' DeStephens NCSSM 1995 From marc@certasaurus.com Mon Sep 18 21:36:00 2000 Date: Mon, 18 Sep 2000 20:36:00 +0000 (GMT) From: Marc Shannon marc@certasaurus.com Subject: SPAM from other alumni? > Can people get our snail mail addresses from this e-mail > list? (I'm not referring to the .vcf card my e-mail software > attaches to these messages -- I'm referring to our actual > home addresses.) No, that's not possible as the mailing list doesn't have any USPS mail information included. I suspect (fear?) that my address was harvested from the alumni directory given out at the last reunion. I should mention that the letter seemed to indicate that it was targeted for certain classes around '84. --Marc From jkjacobs@earthlink.net Tue Sep 19 00:37:05 2000 Date: Mon, 18 Sep 2000 19:37:05 -0400 From: Maguire jkjacobs@earthlink.net Subject: Alumni Event - Washington Have fun everyone! I was sad to see that this is a weeknight event planned to begin during rush hour - I'm a mere 45 minutes (or so) away in Baltimore, but there's no way I could be in DC by 6:30 on a weeknight. julie -- Maguire's Universal Signature: For use in newsgroups and other online situations... If part of this is applicable to you, you'll recognize it. AIM, Yahoo, & MSN ID's: Maguire708 ICQ #: 54035938 IWG #: 708 RenGeek NCSSM: 91 Antioch: 95 ERMS Dx: 93 a11a87 Stone Celery McArgh 208/180/130 "troop leader" to YFWC Please visit every day. I am in no way affiliated with this site, I simply admire their innovative approach. From eric.phifer@painewebber.com Wed Sep 20 14:46:43 2000 Date: Wed, 20 Sep 2000 09:46:43 -0400 From: Eric Phifer eric.phifer@painewebber.com Subject: Spam ------ =_NextPart_000_01C022E7.AF6119A0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Marc and All, Sorry if you who received my mail believed that it was spam. If you = read the letter, you will find that the offer of assistance in the = financial area was made. If that is spam, so be it. I intended by the = mail a genuine offer to help my classmates and an invitation to contact = me (either at home or at work) to catch up. I do not typically offer my = home phone number or invitations to strangers or in general mailings. =20 I apologize if any of you feel that by dropping a letter and some = literature in the mail I have intruded upon you. I maintain my offer to = catch up or to help if desired. Wishing everyone well, Eric Eric B. Phifer Financial Advisor PaineWebber Private Client Group 3737 HSBC Center=20 Buffalo, NY 14203 Phone: 716-849-3818/800-537-7398 -----Original Message----- From: alumni-request@ncssm.net [SMTP:alumni-request@ncssm.net] Sent: Tuesday, September 19, 2000 3:01 PM To: alumni@ncssm.net Subject: alumni digest, Vol 1 #28 - 6 msgs Send alumni mailing list submissions to alumni@ncssm.net To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit http://lists.ncssm.net/mailman/listinfo/alumni or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to alumni-request@ncssm.net You can reach the person managing the list at alumni-admin@ncssm.net When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific than "Re: Contents of alumni digest..." Today's Topics: 1. FW: Alt-Day talk by Dr. Orrin Pilkey (Portzer, Jeremy) 2. SPAM from other alumni? (Marc Shannon) 3. Re: SPAM from other alumni? (Catherine Hardee) 4. upcoming reunion (edest@mse.ufl.edu) 5. Re: Re: SPAM from other alumni? (Marc Shannon) 6. Re: Alumni Event - Washington (Maguire) --__--__-- Message: 1 From: "Portzer, Jeremy" To: Alumni ListServe Subject: FW: Alt-Day talk by Dr. Orrin Pilkey Date: Mon, 18 Sep 2000 14:58:06 -0400 charset=3D"iso-8859-1" FYI. -----Original Message----- From: Hugh Haskell [mailto:haskell@ncssm.edu] Sent: Monday, September 18, 2000 2:55 PM To: _All Staff Subject: Alt-Day talk by Dr. Orrin Pilkey On Friday morning at 11 AM, in the ETC Lecture Hall, the inaugural=20 talk of the Faculty colloquium series for 2000/2001 will be given by=20 Dr. Orrin Pilkey, Director of the Program for the Study of Developed=20 Shorelines at Duke University. The title of his talk will be "A=20 Global View of Barrier Islands, Restless Ribbons of Sand." Dr. Pilkey=20 has been fighting the battle of the barrier islands of North Carolina=20 for 30 years or more. He is an excellent speaker and this is a topic=20 of substantial interest to North Carolinians. All members of the NCSSM family who are available are welcome to=20 attend. Come help us make the 2000/2001 Faculty Colloquium series a=20 rousing success. Thank you all in advance. Hugh Haskell --__--__-- Message: 2 Date: Mon, 18 Sep 2000 20:20:33 +0000 (GMT) From: Marc Shannon Subject: SPAM from other alumni? To: alumni@ncssm.net Did anyone else receive a piece of mail (USPS, not e-mail) from Eric = Phifer at Paine Webber? At first, I was kind of upset at having been spammed by another alumnus, = but then as I thought about it, I was actually surprised that it hadn't = happened before this. I suspect that alumni from other schools, especially = business schools and other professional programs, probably get much more of this. = One piece in sixteen years ain't that bad. Anyway, just thought I'd offer my two cents. Things have been pretty = quiet on this list lately. --Marc --__--__-- Message: 3 Date: Mon, 18 Sep 2000 15:27:18 -0400 From: Catherine Hardee Organization: NCDHHS -- Division of Early Intervention & Education To: alumni@ncssm.net Subject: Re: SPAM from other alumni? boundary=3D"------------9A16FE89772503B6AC9CBC2A" This is a multi-part message in MIME format. --------------9A16FE89772503B6AC9CBC2A Content-Type: text/plain; charset=3Dus-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit I haven't received anything... Can people get our snail mail addresses from this e-mail list? (I'm not = referring to the .vcf card my e-mail software attaches to these messages -- I'm = referring to our actual home addresses.) Marc Shannon wrote: > Did anyone else receive a piece of mail (USPS, not e-mail) from Eric = Phifer at > Paine Webber? > > At first, I was kind of upset at having been spammed by another = alumnus, but > then as I thought about it, I was actually surprised that it hadn't = happened > before this. I suspect that alumni from other schools, especially = business > schools and other professional programs, probably get much more of = this. One > piece in sixteen years ain't that bad. > > Anyway, just thought I'd offer my two cents. Things have been pretty = quiet on > this list lately. > > --Marc > > _______________________________________________ > NCSSM Alumni Mailing List > alumni@ncssm.net > http://lists.ncssm.net/mailman/listinfo/alumni --------------9A16FE89772503B6AC9CBC2A Content-Type: text/x-vcard; charset=3Dus-ascii; name=3D"Catherine.Hardee.vcf" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Description: Card for Catherine Hardee Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=3D"Catherine.Hardee.vcf" begin:vcard=20 n:Hardee;Catherine C. tel;fax:(919) 715-3853 tel;work:(919) 715-7500 ext. 263 x-mozilla-html:TRUE org:NCDHHS -- Division of Early Intervention & Education version:2.1 email;internet:Catherine.Hardee@ncmail.net title:Benefits Representative adr;quoted-printable:;;2302 Mail Service = Center=3D0D=3D0A;Raleigh;NC;27699-2302; fn:Catherine C. Hardee end:vcard --------------9A16FE89772503B6AC9CBC2A-- --__--__-- Message: 4 From: edest@mse.ufl.edu Reply-To: edest@mse.ufl.edu To: alumni@ncssm.net Date: Mon, 18 Sep 2000 18:35:01 GMT Subject: upcoming reunion I would like to encourage alums of the classes '85, '90, & '95 (also = 84/86, 89/91, & 94/96) who are in the Durham area to attend our upcoming = reunion.=20 It isn't too late to RSVP! =20 Elizabeth 'Schultz' DeStephens NCSSM 1995 =20 --__--__-- Message: 5 Date: Mon, 18 Sep 2000 20:36:00 +0000 (GMT) From: Marc Shannon Subject: Re: Re: SPAM from other alumni? To: alumni@ncssm.net > Can people get our snail mail addresses from this e-mail > list? (I'm not referring to the .vcf card my e-mail software > attaches to these messages -- I'm referring to our actual > home addresses.) No, that's not possible as the mailing list doesn't have any USPS mail information included. I suspect (fear?) that my address was harvested from the alumni = directory given out at the last reunion. I should mention that the letter seemed to indicate that it was targeted = for certain classes around '84. --Marc --__--__-- Message: 6 Date: Mon, 18 Sep 2000 19:37:05 -0400 From: Maguire Reply-To: jkjacobs@earthlink.net To: "Francisco, Megan" Cc: Alumni ListServe Subject: Re: Alumni Event - Washington Have fun everyone! I was sad to see that this is a weeknight event = planned to begin during rush hour - I'm a mere 45 minutes (or so) away in Baltimore, but = there's no way I could be in DC by 6:30 on a weeknight. julie -- Maguire's Universal Signature: For use in newsgroups and other online situations... If part of this is applicable to you, you'll recognize it. AIM, Yahoo, & MSN ID's: Maguire708 ICQ #: 54035938 IWG #: 708 RenGeek NCSSM: 91 Antioch: 95 ERMS Dx: 93 a11a87 Stone Celery McArgh 208/180/130 "troop leader" to YFWC Please visit every day. I am in no way affiliated with this site, I simply admire their innovative approach. --__--__-- _______________________________________________ NCSSM Alumni Mailing List alumni@ncssm.net http://lists.ncssm.net/mailman/listinfo/alumni End of alumni Digest_______________________________________________ NCSSM Alumni Mailing List alumni@ncssm.net http://lists.ncssm.net/mailman/listinfo/alumni ------ =_NextPart_000_01C022E7.AF6119A0 Content-Type: application/ms-tnef Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 eJ8+IiwNAQaQCAAEAAAAAAABAAEAAQeQBgAIAAAA5AQAAAAAAADoAAEIgAcAGAAAAElQTS5NaWNy b3NvZnQgTWFpbC5Ob3RlADEIAQ2ABAACAAAAAgACAAEEkAYAkAEAAAEAAAARAAAAAwAAMAIAAAAL AA8OAAAAAAIB/w8BAAAAPwAAAAAAAACBKx+kvqMQGZ1uAN0BD1QCAAAAAGFsdW1uaUBuY3NzbS5u ZXQAU01UUABhbHVtbmlAbmNzc20ubmV0AAAeAAIwAQAAAAUAAABTTVRQAAAAAB4AAzABAAAAEQAA AGFsdW1uaUBuY3NzbS5uZXQAAAAAAwAVDAEAAAADAP4PBgAAAB4AATABAAAAEwAAACdhbHVtbmlA bmNzc20ubmV0JwAAAgELMAEAAAAWAAAAU01UUDpBTFVNTklATkNTU00uTkVUAAAAAwAAOQAAAAAL AEA6AQAAAAMAcToAAAAAHgD2XwEAAAARAAAAYWx1bW5pQG5jc3NtLm5ldAAAAAACAfdfAQAAAD8A AAAAAAAAgSsfpL6jEBmdbgDdAQ9UAgAAAABhbHVtbmlAbmNzc20ubmV0AFNNVFAAYWx1bW5pQG5j c3NtLm5ldAAAAwD9XwEAAAADAP9fAAAAAAIB9g8BAAAABAAAAAAAAAIoTgEEgAEACQAAAFJFOiBT cGFtAIICAQWAAwAOAAAA0AcJABQACQAuACsAAwBZAQEggAMADgAAANAHCQAUAAkAIQAqAAMASwEB CYABACEAAAA0M0NDM0E2REY4OEVENDExOEEyNDAwMjAzNTg1MTgzMADyBgEDkAYAwBUAACIAAAAL AAIAAQAAAAsAIwAAAAAAAwAmAAAAAAALACkAAAAAAAMALgAAAAAAAwA2AAAAAABAADkAIEHVNQkj wAEeAHAAAQAAAAkAAABSRTogU3BhbQAAAAACAXEAAQAAABYAAAABwCMJNdVtOsxHjvgR1IokACA1 hRgwAAAeAB4MAQAAAAUAAABTTVRQAAAAAB4AHwwBAAAAGAAAAGVlMDExMzZAUGFpbmVXZWJiZXIu Y29tAAMABhDyXNjyAwAHEOkYAAAeAAgQAQAAAGUAAABNQVJDQU5EQUxMLFNPUlJZSUZZT1VXSE9S RUNFSVZFRE1ZTUFJTEJFTElFVkVEVEhBVElUV0FTU1BBTUlGWU9VUkVBRFRIRUxFVFRFUixZT1VX SUxMRklORFRIQVRUSEVPRkZFAAAAAAIBCRABAAAAmxIAAJcSAACCJgAATFpGdR8OeTx3AAoBAwH3 IAKkA+MCAGOCaArAc2V0MCAHE48CgwBQAvIPWVRhaANxhQKDMg7ncHJxMg/2Jn0KgAjIIDsJbzI1 ZjUCgAqBdWMAUAsDYwMAQQtgbmcxMDMzpwumBdAKwGMgAHBkD/C4bGwsCqIKhAqAUwWwSHJ5IAaQ IHkIYCAKdxHQIAlwY2VpdjkJgCBtGfAAwAMRYmW2bAiQGxJ0D4AFQGkFQBR3YQQgcwqwbS4gLCBJ GiQJcGEcQmUg6mwPwHQEkCwaNAMQAyDuZguAHEUeUm8BIASQIHHvGGAEEAQAAZBuGuAaAAOg/x5S H6EhcQcxGGAeARzTAMDfAQAdZBxkHQQe8HMaoBvQvxyhHWIhsR7AGIAbIWIZ8NceUhuDIwBnCfB1 C4AgZqZ0GqAeYGxwG0JjC2B/BBAAwB7ABCAYcgORC4B2+xywHIBpAiAn8gWgAjAA0PMFQAeAICga 8B5RBcAcgZcR0SBhK8N3BbBrKSpzoxyAD3AgdXAlY2QaoMRubyAheXBpLVAYwO8Z8CCEG1EsE3AR 0CdxJ0B/BtAgsgXAKdgEICgBIVBy/xchBJAEIDDjJxIEkCKhG4I5C4Bncx1hGPolkGFwsQjxZ2l6 IaEg8W4vEl8aMyCgG+AcVCZBZANgcP8usBcwJvEelBhjJOArMRvw/x7BHIAIcCGnG4MlkA+AGxD5 JaJydSYCLbAqURpBJWP/G4Eq0SHBG1Enpy1WLFIoBq8aEQEAAJAJcS4Y+lcEAN5oN7IcERngMDJ3 G+AY3H5FBRAA4BkJFnYC0RChc0gxNyBCciBCHWBQl0CAIKEY9EYiR0FkKfALJOBFZVALcWVXZWKV MKJQBRB2KREgQxvxOQIwIEcDYC2wGPQzN8FJoCBIU0JDSHBIsbMgsRj0QnUBIAdAbx7w4E5ZIDE0 AdAXgEMoA0UBMDE6IDcxNi0AODQ5LTM4MThALzgwMC01SaAt+UmwOTgWwwu2GQRD2Rj2nwNgHsAr ABJETWAgLVIyXk8FEDVgIlADIE0HkHN+YScgUjNQzE+TCzFRRmn6LUvQNAFAG/BN8E4wDMFRVdNi IEYDYToMg2KvD+AHQDCAAwAtCXBxClBtIVBAIYAo4S4ncAVAW2BTTVRQOlf/WQVdXxj1VwAGYAIw V2dUWJFkXGF5HvAGYAUwZTCTMQ45HvAB0E4wIDM6MMoxRQBNW3dUb1dtWNjxW3h1YmpRcVdtLhBS oBtYoR7wVgbwS8AgIzLKOFIgIFIQbXMz4FPf81TqG/AzNgLRT0pcASmBv2LkM4U5ASFQHRBh4G0E Af8xhRj1AZFgPxj6X5BpYgTy+yURBbF1AIBtBynwIwAeUvpXBbBsGJBAUAEAbvBHoF8e8EaRHLBq WBbDdQMgaOECQHA6Ly9pIjPwWOe+LxuCA4Fx0wuAAhAvWeT/Q8NxQE+VBbBv4iMAXaAbkf8kwWfz KyFTMx9BHGBpYmICqyxSBuBkGfAnKDInai/7Wh9rzlkaUS1QA6AeAS2B/R5ScDJhKlEDgVNQN7Ie U7dpMhyAeP8tHiBpoG56j+9ABB5gfEILUHkzwR7wC1D/HhAPsEDAY0AFQBpBBcBh1f85ASdxJOEc sSRRBGA5kR0gnwWQBpBClhxhA6AiUk0hXwhQJcJyECDTYuouiEAid0K+bKJdEScEIF+QLrFzl1dg GQkdcDEdYEZXTTBxGLB0LURdIBxQB0BreSYyRHIdYFKABRADoFDJAxBrZRnwKFAJETWATR7hSgSQ XaB5KYr2MuEdYFNQQU0fkANhIHDbK5R5sz8rUBgjU4YhLlB6bo73Mx1ghnKPv5DGQ3ccgCuhJ2JI CxEJ4I73NP8dYC2wBaB/8TfQCXBtwCpCPytgPxFYwGSgI5BLIGwu9QmAdY73NZKkks+Qj5Ge7jaS pBiwYvNFGxBIwWRgvlcc8ECCKACXQRggZydQzwlwjvUY9FIwX1+gBBj6f1MVTTAWY0WxVzKGUI4N IrwgPDUgjiNY1ZhRPmxm3Zz3TCFBBmE6wTxrDqUF/2HWi5+Mr42xGPSpUB7ATTB+TQIgHvBN8F1S XjRL0DrsNTheoFIRMFXwT5UPdUw9IkahTYA4NU2wMfGIe0ZZST+LUj9TTaJk2Eh1Zy2QlTBzjbAf ce5bcPYbgigAOg+As/OkaL10ViBbZVwDq8JdHjheJdoyrQA1Xtelcl8YsQYAvwGQASCn7akfqi+I rk8DoH9XIG9wvGGE4QMAN8IFQDFPXsCZ4B7wIcVFVEogTP9RcTmClTAYwR5DIkGzkAhw3yKhhbW8 oiDhHlJGANBxQNcukCqhGMBvWIBpMIB2Ed8IgQQgAhAFwF5CL15BXsD/H1MlETVgnZEmMqsVjP0e 8P5EP0ErAAWxxBVIADVQMiC/mkDGIh5SutA7MDYDRBwR/wkAfQAYkBlVEdAJcIQCKUHJBUBEdY2w IFUDAEDhtXAheR1gVB5hKjB0HpCfINJAgDGxvKLHBiJBNCXqRwkAYiKhVgiQB+Ag4S5CCsAIgh2A cxcRZHPfHvCGcCFQHpAEEVJtUAbg/wYxIOEGET9wo8CM4o2FGPT/tVEbwYGhH6CzoHORfeTRsH8C QM+E12TSlAQA0xMg0k7/CREtkJSQA2AzsSMAGPTGInozD+B5HhAydITiHWBI9yGhKUJAwHga4BjA SLKFMf5hjbA4ZBxgJFHckifxLrH/NCUg4WzyIWEqMCKhJbIJcP9pQSgB2bsHMACAP4u6kgeAxzCS hyMeUk5DU1mQH5D/HUADEBnwGoIi0RhgSDADEP8BoM+B5YJBYZZxzzEaoBj0v9exJeEdYAhQKzEo M3UjQv/OIR5SxmjEhghQxS7ahkkB9wCQN8FpcGMa4AQQP4vPEP8AcLzAGkIu4SGyHiBIMCGB/z+L s4q+H5//oQ0SYKsvrDnNAdA69hEXcCArXlEP4PwoR1mgjvWiZJtao9AAwP0YQEAa4AAgHPDC4Dsg M/D/lnGn3pnPmtSlGGsPGQnJkP8pgkETG+CCsRrFJvEusBrR0yDSG4MoVfswUx7wLlL/U3Abgi0A +4NEk0UUfodHQ/9vojCh/JXi5X5wH6APoGOR+yWQHOJrH7Ig4S2wD7Er0/86sDey1oMdIiswJiPg MJpp8+jQHvBidWE1HlHvAeuw/yWQ2eDsYNbxGGDUQApwHKHbBlYq8XUu42lwchMADyDjHDkRMGRu JwfCN5AzEf9VARkSG9DGIekyErAdYCWQ/2lwhTIgIhyBYtX7iW0gLBD/2kDTUeughUIu4wpg7IGy Ef+K9BL1GGOaZFExNpBpwyKh/1ExysLTUVEx0bDmIHhAduB/KxHs4C2QhOPEExCivzBl74r0AKSN UeyAeB7AgaHbdP8EUQ8BNuQeIOJ8NfAjIF0xzmro0CAiC7RJJwcCL1X+dCzAKKCG8s7yM8I6lNaD /1EwOCF4QMVRWVEqUIW2JFH/aSPmADkwLwCwXZtS8S/yPy+hDUwV9K+shTX2MDc6v6whrXmiZJSe prCUly6VNO9Y0QEyp5mxcGfgMDVwMWPzTTDkcERISfBSIcmBcALbO6HPsUX4IA1xSUpinZL9lyIm RICYYD2hlyH8r2C9/6hHmY/8Dgwht+FBAK6QsSMJN+U5QU1gRkU4ORA3NzI1TABCNkHIQzlDShAy QYh7ICH/3oUYcLwgVbBMkRhRdqWNUfBNSU1FxhIBMIgwsMmPOB85Lor0hrUtVHl9ALdNMEhQGuAv gnAEUTt8EO+uNejQf8BtIGl0QECMytDzbdADgS1F72B4IJ5BTTH+YnA37WMQ4CCSDvIABf8jv95R IFCIQe1alJAhEWXMcPfPgRgyg0Jz2nABUQEzHGD+ZODhrmDGATXS3lMCNGkT/5sgjeAeoJpAAfLN UAOBjUHOZ4W1bNDpUi52cQB8Ee9U8B8yTEWEUGYfcOWD58D/fIHroU6kgrF2leuwL9FNMn9Nt3jH g0INFOhw6EJLBy7bnzv4G3dlYoqLPsmB/y//AD8BTwJfA2xYgARPWGFYJv8F3wbvB/8JDwocWIAK /wwP/w0fDi8PPFiAEB8RLxI/E0//FFpYgBUfFi8XPxhPGVxYgP8aPxtPHFhfOB1vHn8fjyCf/yGs ZOIir177JFpfNyXwgK//gb+CeVgm5HSdFZ7AXBDAEj+mIlgmM09YNbRm1wB0cLg6Ly9Msmrgp0cv WtLdWtBuiHONUMYgL5QEtmafsG8+bz9/QI9BlXgtTyDzK/FCX2k7laXacOhQrpD/LG5PEq9VQ99E 747JzCBtIP+xgLhgLxPaEcygxiIrTpY9/32go/DOsS8TUOToUJ2wkba/X/DdQZJPk10PtrGhOpBD 18gFLzCdhDsrSEOwVSNBAjvk0Hg6KDkxOeVcMDcpoC0zrwAnxaHC6XogcmuiOTc5UPbgQcG56BAy NifFkCDcAHrHEQRhLdcAbWw6VFLsVUVTxS6QOi9vMH8xj+d8tc6DLyEyLofA7WPjkO1a4Tvgoy3h OixvLXgKlfnPYjpCD3Ff8HqANSF70b9R0N1gLvHMQOdVSyA7xVA9V4FkO+DI0VEA5iE6O/Q7MttA MoTDKQGpsFzAR6Eh3VHjwD0wRLSAQdw7UrygWdDwgDvkcLLwYDc2OTktswKRtWb/LzCgqpkL5+Gf RIt/jI85Lu8mXCUfJi/zpzQqig+Q05FmQHGw3DB1Zi3AD5B1/5HEsFFngJSwMxHAjzKvho37KD8p RTj2YCmw6gH3ETRN/2FA+gFiAs1QN2Ayd0XMeiD/i0DMoNpQ6SJOsOfg+gD5sLc8gvwy4+dj5gBL Uyei8HHTYCc5MNNgqkDOIDUHWxDQMFBQIDg0LzhsNiyRxLsAL6JQzlI5ec9AOTZcMOVG7vHpUkT/ +bCQwFyA5YHe0lDS5+FKA//IzugQRiVmYUpQdkJvkCMTweEiUlNWUCFNAO1ankXaUC7gXpDZ4SdT kLBJO6F6J1iQZVPFwHD/ZRFu1eR0omDOoJHFyc+9v8/zTdpVxa/1tzM2x2D24P/2r/e/+M/53zTn NT/8D8Qf//4sWIBJL0o/S09b41gmTL//UxlOz0/ehZdQ/1IP7mpUKGdYJlTfOklOb2Qwa7In/ztQ W5KagaiQsqFlQtGiWtLzYgJ9k2Rv66BpBFnyWPD+IFsyWsORxIpCPWKoonUA3c1QdSwQHHxrGCgD gOHQ/j9cMGuzeeHrNWbTkMFGwP+KIGghS6XMZGxBlZBZoVOg/zegkcSfEEbB6jFhg9GizWH/RwLU NP2NeNHLMZuCqKJrs/8EA3vxbPJ7kGLS0qFg0VzA/9XjaGVggvHALpCRAAEScyB/kcTi83UBzVbh 0DdSzcE0byOPJJ/bz9zfNt3/KOs5u8cwKeAwzrAqP4TQZ3xQYXMxPGpravHQchBz7kB1wWuwhQFr LdnB+BTv+xXz5tgiKuBY4G3wbSD3gfsnMC6hIuKAXFAZhYZ1wWH5LhVDY0VghGWFUrOiLDHv537j 7yeRhGVFqcITMF5Qv+MwetJToMm7K+BZ8WY3YP9MMKtRWQLWkWBkPHAIMwfh6wbWOxZ3e5BrLsBl 4iKx/yBxQgHiQAgknvORxMFwU1P/43Fy8HjRVEDzZDtxq2DyoN40zrDJAWZQ66EomEFQUO1cMGF4 IXTyQm4Qr2BzEv9kM9GSsID385HEKuJrEMwB58sxXpB08kRDYwLgALMQ93yRJTq3kDyagGZQFkV4 cL+FAHQVDoZWNhRz9/FV5qD7q1JxIVO1MOqQZ0CwgFe1nkaYQWtAPKO3UHdzcYD/ZkBhUG/ZEbCF AfKgmqFUkPep8mrgSEZJWrA783NlOzO/aWCFAO+w+LLSoVkAdWQwvTpRJ6ZAWZJxcOagejyhRz2W FN8V60FJTWQwWUZhb4HOUk1TTmsAREf38EVgFEY3MDhGJUO4USAj3cETYMdAOaLg+UYlV0dA4kAh 7aBCq+Ug/G5HJXHZaR+wolBCq3fwz6nxkLBEsdpVRVI/ANiwC6Ig0HAzQqlhMTFh/Dg3xnAhMZlm WVAi0eGwPGNBCfBy8EKmxsA4L53GUDBK4LMQkcQidHIAP+mwB2H/4KtgGmDSoVlG9FdDDcpQTDHy kahyeSDqPIedd0+wLtGh2FB68NerYhFg46IvivYgWIAis//6IHgwN9Zv0FyANSLvACri3mF5kITx 1eGfkHdmgHLw731DUIJmoqiQbcIR6yHJAN9qg1nQCoV1AGNQdrDjOWL/cgDx0QybWL8Of1l6gn9c //+Cv9mmhG+Fdud/WYSHr4i//4nPit9mj5VQeWJr9ppQ8xH+dF3faj9eH18vYD9hT2Jfr2NvZH9l j1mefZ7QAHUQAAMAEBAAAAAAAwAREAAAAAAeAEIQAQAAAAEAAAAAAAAAAwCAEP////9AAAcwcN6w ZAcjwAFAAAgwcN6wZAcjwAELAACACCAGAAAAAADAAAAAAAAARgAAAAADhQAAAAAAAAMAAoAIIAYA AAAAAMAAAAAAAABGAAAAABCFAAAAAAAAAwAFgAggBgAAAAAAwAAAAAAAAEYAAAAAUoUAAPMVAAAe ACWACCAGAAAAAADAAAAAAAAARgAAAABUhQAAAQAAAAUAAAA4LjA0AAAAAAMAJoAIIAYAAAAAAMAA AAAAAABGAAAAAAGFAAAAAAAACwAvgAggBgAAAAAAwAAAAAAAAEYAAAAADoUAAAAAAAADADCACCAG AAAAAADAAAAAAAAARgAAAAARhQAAAAAAAAMAMoAIIAYAAAAAAMAAAAAAAABGAAAAABiFAAAAAAAA HgBBgAggBgAAAAAAwAAAAAAAAEYAAAAANoUAAAEAAAABAAAAAAAAAB4AQoAIIAYAAAAAAMAAAAAA AABGAAAAADeFAAABAAAAAQAAAAAAAAAeAEOACCAGAAAAAADAAAAAAAAARgAAAAA4hQAAAQAAAAEA AAAAAAAAHgA9AAEAAAAFAAAAUkU6IAAAAAADAA00/TcAAEAv ------ =_NextPart_000_01C022E7.AF6119A0-- From scotte@ncssm.edu Sat Sep 23 02:46:59 2000 Date: Fri, 22 Sep 2000 21:46:59 -0400 From: Scott, Evan scotte@ncssm.edu Subject: Student Censorship at NCSSM > Dear NCSSM Students and Staff - > > NCSSM is a community where there supposedly exists a freedom to > learn and grow both academically and socially. Being a residential high > school, the students supposedly come first, and it is stated that we, the > student body, are on the same level as the executive director and board of > trustees. Ask yourselves, "is this really the case?" We'll answer for > you. It's not. > > Many of you are disillusioned with the school; many people complain > about a multitude of grievances and annoyances, but feel powerless to > address these issues. There are systemic problems with student life, a > perceived ineffectiveness of student-based groups such as SGA and APC, and > bizarre implementations of the judicial code. This is blatantly shown > through the recent addition of a "proxy server" and filtration software > that monitors and restricts student access to knowledge and information on > the internet. Is such a "big brother" approach to student life what is > needed at OUR school? It seems to many that this is simply another aspect > of a general distrust of students by the administration and student life > staffs. > > Instead of simply complaining about the problem, we consider it > necessary to take direct and immediate action against any policy or > implemenation that violates the trust between students and adults on > campus. As such, we would like to hold a speakout regarding the > censorship and distrust of students this Wednesday, September 27th, with > the hope of achieving immediate removal of any filtering and logging of > students by the ITS staff. Also, we hope that by opening a grassroots > line of communication to the administration, student issues can begin to > be addressed seriously and effectively. > > Please come express your views about the community as they relate to > student life on Wednesday, September 27th at 6:30 P.M. in the assembly > hall. Your presence is needed so that we can stop the censorship and > surveillance of students! Thank you for your time. > > -- The members of AIR: Actively Instigating Reform From bolkey@seas.upenn.edu Sun Sep 24 02:02:00 2000 Date: Sat, 23 Sep 2000 21:02:00 -0400 From: rick bolkey bolkey@seas.upenn.edu Subject: Student Censorship at NCSSM anyone know more about this. if they're just complaining that they can't access napster or porn, they ain't going to get far. There are colleges that can't handle the bandwith due to napster, let alone ncssm. From barlowg@ncssm.net Sun Sep 24 04:19:33 2000 Date: Sat, 23 Sep 2000 23:19:33 -0400 (EDT) From: Gregory J. Barlow barlowg@ncssm.net Subject: Student Censorship at NCSSM On Sat, 23 Sep 2000, rick bolkey wrote: > anyone know more about this. if they're just complaining that they > can't access napster or porn, they ain't going to get far. There are > colleges that can't handle the bandwith due to napster, let alone > ncssm. All network traffic goes through the proxy. At one point, the proxy was blocking iluvatar.ncssm.edu (the student unix web server) in addition to valid educational web sites. I have talked with several NCSSM teachers who have had this experience. This is the problem with any similar proxy, it eliminates the freedom that academic institutions embody. I hear Dr. Boarman is doing a lot of great things this year, but I believe he has made a mistake here. Hopefully he will recognize it. NB: All information was obtained from current NCSSM faculty, staff, and students -- Gregory J. Barlow http://barlow.ncssm.net NCSSM 99 barlowg@ncssm.net NC State gjbarlow@eos.ncsu.edu -- "Don't marry for money, you can borrow it cheaper" - Scottish Proverb From tdcallaw@unity.ncsu.edu Sun Sep 24 08:28:27 2000 Date: Sun, 24 Sep 2000 03:28:27 -0400 (EDT) From: spot tdcallaw@unity.ncsu.edu Subject: Student Censorship at NCSSM > NCSSM is a community where there supposedly exists a freedom to > learn and grow both academically and socially. Being a residential high > school, the students supposedly come first, and it is stated that we, > the student body, are on the same level as the executive director and > board of trustees. Ask yourselves, "is this really the case?" We'll > answer for you. It's not. *laughing* Some things will never change. Man, I'm feeling my age with this one. Evan seems to have some of the fire that I had when I was at S&M. > Many of you are disillusioned with the school; many people > complain about a multitude of grievances and annoyances, but feel > powerless to address these issues. There are systemic problems with > student life, a perceived ineffectiveness of student-based groups such > as SGA and APC, and bizarre implementations of the judicial code. This > is blatantly shown through the recent addition of a "proxy server" and > filtration software that monitors and restricts student access to > knowledge and information on the internet. Is such a "big > brother" approach to student life what is needed at OUR school? It > seems to many that this is simply another aspect of a general distrust > of students by the administration and student life staffs. Well, some things do change. Before, my complaints were "No internet in my dorm room" and "no implementation of judicial code", and now the students are crying "no clean internet in my dorm room" and "bizarre implementation of judicial code". But is a big brother approach really necessary? As much as the hacker in me wants to say no, perhaps it is. Maybe ITS has that proxy on a bit too strong, but you're still students under the care of the state. They pay the bill for those data pipes, and are responsible for what you (student body) pumps across them. As to logging, hell, they did that when I was there, and more than likely before then. On a public network, you should assume that nothing is secure. Every good sysadmin logs & monitors traffic. > Instead of simply complaining about the problem, we consider it > necessary to take direct and immediate action against any policy or > implemenation that violates the trust between students and adults on > campus. As such, we would like to hold a speakout regarding the > censorship and distrust of students this Wednesday, September 27th, with > the hope of achieving immediate removal of any filtering and logging of > students by the ITS staff. Also, we hope that by opening a grassroots > line of communication to the administration, student issues can begin to > be addressed seriously and effectively. Its a wonderful thought, but I hate to say "been there, tried that". I hope it is more successful for this class than it was for mine. All we got was one RAship threatened, and yours truly being accused of attempting to incite a riot. > -- The members of AIR: Actively Instigating Reform Hmm... always liked COPS better. A word of advice, while actively instigating reform, remember to keep yourself grounded. Yes, a lot is broken and needs to be fixed, but remember that a lot of things do work right. (can anyone else believe I'm saying this?) And no, this email isnt entirely without point. I thought it would be appropriate to copy my opinions on the proxy issue when it was proposed on the Parents list (NCSSMPAR on the Duke listserv), since most of the readers of this list (and Evan) probably never saw it. --- Date: Thu, 3 Feb 2000 20:49:26 -0500 (EST) From: spot To: NCSSMPAR@LIST.MC.DUKE.EDU Subject: Re: Wiring in Student Rooms First of all, I agree entirely with Jordan's statements, as well as supporting the majority of the comments posted, this is simply my 10 cents. 1) The dorms should be wired for internet access. For the record, some of them already have the base wiring in place, namely Hunt. The benefits far outweigh the disadvantages, and I think the school recognizes this. 2) Some form of security/filtering needs to be placed on the indorm internet connection. This is not going to be popular amongst the students, but it needs to be done for a wide variety of reasons. A) Students should not be serving material of any type from their dorm room. This means no FTP servers, no web servers, no IRC servers, and (most unpopular), no world accessable gaming servers. The logic behind this should go without question. This can be achieved with filtering on the routers. B) "Questionable" material needs to be filtered out. Sorry students, NCSSM's t1 does not exist to supply you with porn or bomb plans. There are several applications that can serve to filter out these contents on UniDormNet. C) UniDormNet needs to be monitored. Properly. Not by an SLI who barely knows how to check his AOL mail, or by a work-service student who turns his head at violations. Simply the knowledge that the users are being monitored constantly by people who know what they're doing is enough to discourage all but the most insane. If the user picture was a bell curve, then monitoring effectively limits dangerous users to the outliers. (I had to stick some math in here somewhere) Its important to remember that students coming in to NCSSM are considered the best and brightest in the state, and computing ability is not an exclusion. This leads to D... D) Competant administration. If the administration is weak, then the system is weak, and users will walk all over both the system and the admin. This leads to potential system damage, rendering the system unusable for however long it takes to repair. Not to mention the potential for using the system for misuse on a wider scale (internet denial of service attacks, etc etc.) 3) Yes, some students will find ways to circumvent filtering and security measures, but that is not an excuse to not install these measures. The measures will serve as enough of a deterrent to most of the users that they won't spend large amounts of time to get around them. This is assuming that they have other things to channel their energy into, especially computer oriented classes. Not to get horribly off topic, but the current state of computer related classes at NCSSM is sad. Some of the brightest and best computer talents in the state pass through those halls without ever being noticed by the school, unless they're labeled as "computer vandals". If more classes existed as options for these students, I promise you that the system would face far less security breaches and inappropriate usage. 4) Web servers in public computing areas. I'm not sure what the logic behind this suggestion is, but I personally cannot come up with a single good reason for this. On campus computing can not take responsibility for private machines placed in their domain, and they shouldn't have to. Not to mention the concerns of theft and physical damage to machines. Even if the web servers were placed on NCSSM owned machines, what purpose do they serve? As Jordan pointed out, there is a Unix machine devoted to serving student web pages, and any student can get an account. I had a webpage on that very same machine from 96-98, and never once did I find a need for another webserver. HOWEVER, if the need still remains, go to a free homepage provider on the net (there are several), and build one there. 5)Network multiplayer gaming: This is going to happen whether it is allowed on UniDormNet or not. Students have always strung cabling between rooms and played games amongst each other. S&M students are competetive, we've been told our entire lives that we need to be in order to be the top of the food chain, and online gaming is an expression of this. Perhaps times can be set aside during which online gaming will be allowed. I think gaming should be allowed on an local network only basis, and perhaps even encouraged on some level. Tournaments could be held for prizes, etc etc. Some sacrifices must be made to attend NCSSM, no car, no co-ed living, and no internet gaming. --- Thats my opinion on the matter. :) ~tom "spot" callaway -- NCSSM Class of 1998, voted "Most likely to embezzle money (and get away with it)" From seah2o@nc.rr.com Sun Sep 24 16:43:14 2000 Date: Sun, 24 Sep 2000 11:43:14 -0400 From: Lisa seah2o@nc.rr.com Subject: Student Censorship at NCSSM >But is a big brother approach really necessary? As much as the hacker in >me wants to say no, perhaps it is. Maybe ITS has that proxy on a bit too >strong, but you're still students under the care of the state. They pay >the bill for those data pipes, and are responsible for what you (student >body) pumps across them. As to logging, hell, they did that when I was >there, and more than likely before then. On a public network, you should >assume that nothing is secure. Every good sysadmin logs & monitors >traffic. Spot, I completely agree...this is reality. Anytime someone is supplying you with free internet, it is understood that there are privacy risks...sometimes that's how companies make their money (researching what you are interested in). See also "the VIC and MVP cards". I completely believe in free speech and the right to internet viewing completely unabridged for all, and can quote the _Areopagitica_ to help support the case, but there ain't no free lunch and taxpayers probably don't want to pay for people to view porn or whatever else II or anyone might want to check out on the internet, and I don't expect taxpayers to pay for my choices. Part of becoming an adult for me was realizing that if I want something, I have to go get it...if you really want freedom, pay for it...pay $10 or $20 a month for your own connection. > >Its a wonderful thought, but I hate to say "been there, tried that". I >hope it is more successful for this class than it was for mine. All we got >was one RAship threatened, and yours truly being accused of attempting to >incite a riot. > I have been listening here for sometime and seen that the complaints of students has changed severely since I was a student there in the 80s. Has the student body changed or has history so affected the decision makers that no class is treated with a tabula rasa tactic? >> -- The members of AIR: Actively Instigating Reform > >Hmm... always liked COPS better. A word of advice, while actively >instigating reform, remember to keep yourself grounded. Yes, a lot is >broken and needs to be fixed, but remember that a lot of things do work >right. (can anyone else believe I'm saying this?) I can...yup Spot, we're becoming old fogeys. :) > "When in the East the Morning Ray Hangs out the Colours of the Day, The Bee through these known Allies hums, Beating the Dian with its Drumms. Then Flow'rs their drowsie Eylids raise, Their Silken Ensigns each displayes, And dries its Pan yet dank with Dew, And fills its Flask with Odours new." --Andrew Marvell From jspaleta@Princeton.EDU Sun Sep 24 22:02:55 2000 Date: Sun, 24 Sep 2000 17:02:55 -0400 (EDT) From: Jeffrey D. Spaleta jspaleta@Princeton.EDU Subject: Student Censorship at NCSSM On Sun, 24 Sep 2000, Lisa wrote: > I completely > believe in free speech and the right to internet viewing completely > unabridged for all, and can quote the _Areopagitica_ to help support the > case, but there ain't no free lunch and taxpayers probably don't want to > pay for people to view porn or whatever else II or anyone might want to > check out on the internet, and I don't expect taxpayers to pay for my > choices. I have to disagree here. Filtering web access for inappropriate material is an extremely messy proposition for a public institution. If someone what's to filter at home, or a business wants to filter there workers that's fine, but public networks have a duty to provide unbiased information to all. I've kept up with the censorware development, and every comercial implementation of filtering software over steps its bounds and produces a number of false blocks on political, lifestyle and health related issues. For instance, some have blocked the ACLU and the National Democratic Party's homepage, most block sites with content for gay and lesbian readers, some even block critical commentary about censorware itself, and there is the wide range of health care information that is deemed "inappropriate". Of course to talk about the problems with filtering in detail I would need to know the specifics of the proxy being use. The point I want to make is every commercial filtering product out there is biased in a very crucial ways. Some taxpayers might take issues with some information being accessed, but public networks must be free to allow minority view points to be expressed and heard. Public institutions have a duty to provide open access to information for all, and not just for the taboo ladened majority. As for the issue of pornagraphy...what is pornagraphy? Is there a NC definition, and does the censorware being used use that exact definition? Inapporiate material can not be defined in a global way, and must be defined by the community if at all. Again I need to know what the filtering software is exactly to understand how well it complies with the definitions of NC law. I supect that what is being used holds no regard for the NCSSM or NC definitions of inappropriate and instead NCSSM is using whatever the commercial software thinks is appropriate. Do NCSSM students really need to be protected from the world? We had bomb-making and playboys in my room, err on the hall without internet access. The best way to deal with this is to setup a good usage policy, and deal with infractions on a case by case basis. A less better way to do this is log web access on a student by student basis and then send the logs to the parents, who can then request the student's access be revoked if they don't think the student is using it appropiately. >Part of becoming an adult for me was realizing that if I want > something, I have to go get it...if you really want freedom, pay for > it...pay $10 or $20 a month for your own connection. Do the NCSSM residents have the choice to get there own connections? Frankly I'm suprised they are allowed net connections at all..we didn't have phones or tv in our rooms. I would have paid for cable, phone, and net hook up if I were given the oppurtunity. Hell I'd imagine a floor in New Dorm (Hunt) would go in together for a nice fat DSL line to share and set up a WAN to use if they were allowed to do it. As for the issue of student run servers. I have no problem with this restriction, as long as students are able to use the available services like ftp and the web when needed. The fewer people running servers, the fewer network security holes. I'd be happier about it if students were allowed to buy there own outside connections if they felt they really needed to run a certain server. -jef NCSSM '93 3rd West From seah2o@nc.rr.com Sun Sep 24 22:31:38 2000 Date: Sun, 24 Sep 2000 17:31:38 -0400 From: Lisa seah2o@nc.rr.com Subject: Student Censorship at NCSSM >On Sun, 24 Sep 2000, Lisa wrote: > > >> I completely >> believe in free speech and the right to internet viewing completely >> unabridged for all, and can quote the _Areopagitica_ to help support the >> case, but there ain't no free lunch and taxpayers probably don't want to >> pay for people to view porn or whatever else II or anyone might want to >> check out on the internet, and I don't expect taxpayers to pay for my >> choices. > >I have to disagree here. Filtering web access for inappropriate material >is an extremely messy proposition for a public institution. Right, but this is not a public institution...it may be paid for with some public moneys, but also with private. While NCSSM allows anyone to apply, not everyone can attend. Similarly, while this seems like a "public network" it indeed is not--if it were truly "public" anyone could access it. My next question relates to networks operated by public libraries and other such "public" institutions which make network access available to any and all...do the libraries networks have censors? Lisa "When in the East the Morning Ray Hangs out the Colours of the Day, The Bee through these known Allies hums, Beating the Dian with its Drumms. Then Flow'rs their drowsie Eylids raise, Their Silken Ensigns each displayes, And dries its Pan yet dank with Dew, And fills its Flask with Odours new." --Andrew Marvell From jmm@computer.org Sun Sep 24 22:34:43 2000 Date: Sun, 24 Sep 2000 17:34:43 -0400 From: James Manning jmm@computer.org Subject: Student Censorship at NCSSM [Lisa] > >I have to disagree here. Filtering web access for inappropriate material > >is an extremely messy proposition for a public institution. > > Right, but this is not a public institution...it may be paid for with some > public moneys, but also with private. While NCSSM allows anyone to apply, > not everyone can attend. Similarly, while this seems like a "public > network" it indeed is not--if it were truly "public" anyone could access it. Not public network (noone is claiming that), but it is definitely a public institution. It is part of the UNC system (at least all the equipment was stamped as such during my time there). It is publically funded (the fact that there are private donations means nothing, as it doesn't keep NCSU, UNC-CH, etc from being public institutions). Also, not accepting everyone is equally irrelevant, as people get rejections from NCSU, UNC-CH, UNC-C, etc. NCSSM is definitely a public institution. As a taxpayer, I hate the idea that the money the state government has taken from me will go towards enforcing censorship on any UNC system campus. Propogation of fascism and all that. It hurts more that it's a place of which I am an alumnus. -- James Manning GPG Key fingerprint = B913 2FBD 14A9 CE18 B2B7 9C8E A0BF B026 EEBB F6E4 From the_blue_cow@hotmail.com Sun Sep 24 15:55:12 2000 Date: Sun, 24 Sep 2000 14:55:12 AKDT From: Jennifer E. Newport the_blue_cow@hotmail.com Subject: Student Censorship at NCSSM I was fifteen when I first came to science and math. There are many younger than me who go. Should these people have access to the multitude of "opportunities" on the internet purely in the interest of upholding the second amendment (which doesn't even apply to minors)? Everyone attending s&m is a minor, in some sense of the word. Also, the process of monitoring the activity of students on school run networks is a common practice, one that students should get used to. I know that here at CSU, all of our network use is monitored, specific logs are made of each room's network usage. The longer I am away from science and math, the more I've come to realize how lucky we were and how we complained entirely too much. I cannot see the reason why a person would complain about having great internet access for free simply because they were being monitored. If you are using the network for the purposes intended, why would it even matter if they were keeping logs of your activity? I can see very well where the administration is coming from with this. A parent sends their child to science and math under the assumption that he or she will be well supervised, not allowed to do whatever he wants. If the students were allowed to run free on the internet, the administration would be under constant bombardment of complaints from parents (and even some other students), which would no doubt cause unwanted media attention to the school. I guess I've always sided with the administration on issues like this one, though. Jennifer _________________________________________________________________________ Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com. Share information about yourself, create your own public profile at http://profiles.msn.com. From seah2o@nc.rr.com Mon Sep 25 01:54:34 2000 Date: Sun, 24 Sep 2000 20:54:34 -0400 From: Lisa seah2o@nc.rr.com Subject: Student Censorship at NCSSM At 05:34 PM 9/24/00 -0400, James Manning wrote: >[Lisa] >> >I have to disagree here. Filtering web access for inappropriate material >> >is an extremely messy proposition for a public institution. >> Okay, whoa, let's back up here and let me start from the clearing again. We were talking about a proxy...which in itself is only a helpful item but which, like many useful entities, can be abused. So I guess what we really need to know for this argument is what this specific proxy does. Now again, let me say, that I believe in free speech and do not believe in censorship, and I think pornography is just as valid in its existence as the epics of Homer. I am not the one to say which is better or longer-lasting (indeed pornography is even older than the Homerian epics, but that's another discussion). I personally think that we should all have the right to look at and read whatever the hell we want on the internet, but it may be that there is some legality (the waiver signed by the parents perhaps???) that affects the way the internet is filtered for students at NCSSM. I'm sorry, but if you are under 18 in America, that's the way it is. James you make an absolutely valid point about public institutions and NCSSM being one--I'll definitely give you that one. But again, I have to say, we are dealing with minors and the law in this country is the law...if I had it my way, there would be no restrictions, but that's probably why they would never let me be the Director. :) > >As a taxpayer, I hate the idea that the money the state government has >taken from me will go towards enforcing censorship on any UNC system campus. >Propogation of fascism and all that. I do too, but it's a choice we make living in the United States. I hate paying taxes and disagree with several laws, but I like living here otherwise and won't break the law to jeopardise that...it's the price we pay being citizens. Hey, let's go start our own country and our own S&M and let's all be free range on the internet. :) "When in the East the Morning Ray Hangs out the Colours of the Day, The Bee through these known Allies hums, Beating the Dian with its Drumms. Then Flow'rs their drowsie Eylids raise, Their Silken Ensigns each displayes, And dries its Pan yet dank with Dew, And fills its Flask with Odours new." --Andrew Marvell From annelincoln@wsu.edu Mon Sep 25 01:45:53 2000 Date: Sun, 24 Sep 2000 17:45:53 -0700 From: Anne E. Lincoln annelincoln@wsu.edu Subject: Student Censorship at NCSSM From: "Jennifer E. Newport" >The longer I am away from science and math, the more I've come to > realize how lucky we were and how we complained entirely too much. I > cannot see the reason why a person would complain about having great > internet access for free simply because they were being monitored. If you > are using the network for the purposes intended, why would it even matter if > they were keeping logs of your activity? This sort of opinion, particularly the last sentence, scares the hell out of me. Anne E. Lincoln c/o 1992 Anne E. Lincoln (annelincoln@wsu.edu) Washington State University Department of Sociology http://www.wsu.edu/~lincoln From scott@ucolick.org Mon Sep 25 04:29:26 2000 Date: Sun, 24 Sep 2000 20:29:26 -0700 (PDT) From: Scott Seagroves scott@ucolick.org Subject: Student Censorship at NCSSM > From: "Jennifer E. Newport" > > The longer I am away from science and math, the more I've come to > realize how lucky we were and how we complained entirely too much. I > cannot see the reason why a person would complain about having great > internet access for free simply because they were being monitored. If you > are using the network for the purposes intended, why would it even matter > if they were keeping logs of your activity? > "how lucky we were" - True, most of us were quite lucky to have taken what we got from NCSSM. I bet most of us agree with you on this little part. "complained entirely too much" - True, but this is a symptom of being a teenager in high school, and has very little to do with NCSSM itself. We'd have complained too much no matter what we were doing. "complain about having great internet access for free" - What a strange way to put that sentence. It's not as though anyone is actually upset that their internet access is not costing them anything; *all* the resources afforded students at NCSSM are "free" (you know what I mean ... shared by the taxpayers, etc.) You confuse the issue by making it sound as though students are clamoring to pay ... They're really complaining "simply because they are being monitored". Ah, and then there's that gem: "If you are using the network for the purposes intended, why would it even matter if they were keeping logs of your activity?" Do I have to point out the obvious questions of - who defines the `intended purposes'? - what are the `intended purposes'? - who are the `they' who are allowed to monitor? - who else has access to logs? - etc. Well, now I see the posting from Anne Lincoln on this same paragraph. I think she said what I mean, but much more succinctly. Scott --------------------------------------------- Scott Seagroves Dept. of Astronomy & Astrophysics, UC-Santa Cruz UC Observatories / Lick Observatory scott@ucolick.org --------------------------------------------- From the_blue_cow@hotmail.com Mon Sep 25 04:46:52 2000 Date: Sun, 24 Sep 2000 21:46:52 -0600 From: Jennifer E Newport the_blue_cow@hotmail.com Subject: Student Censorship at NCSSM >when doesn't the constitution doesn't apply to minors? I didn't see an >"18 and over" clause in there. > >Also, the second amendment covers the right to bear arms, which I don't >think is what is really getting discussed here w.r.t. internet censorship. Goodness... thanks for bringing that up... don't know if that was just a typo or if it was the cold medicine talking, but I meant the first amendment. I didn't mean that the constitution doesn't apply to minors; I meant that in practice minors have been excluded from many amendment rights (particularly first amendment rights) due to the fact that at an age younger than eighteen, people are not able to make informed decisions. (makes sense, right?) I never understood it. on 9/24/00 6:45 PM, Anne E. Lincoln at annelincoln@wsu.edu wrote: >> The longer I am away from science and math, the more I've come to >> realize how lucky we were and how we complained entirely too much. I >> cannot see the reason why a person would complain about having great >> internet access for free simply because they were being monitored. If you >> are using the network for the purposes intended, why would it even matter > if >> they were keeping logs of your activity? > > This sort of opinion, particularly the last sentence, scares the hell out of > me. Why does this scare the hell out of you, exactly? I severely dislike it when people make a statement like that with no reasoning behind it, just an opinion (a red zinger opinion at that). I will readily admit that I am of a primarily socialist ideology, which is going to contrast most americans' (who are, I have found, quite liberalist) views of freedom. A liberalist is going to believe that there should be no censorship whatsoever, however, a socialist is going to believe that a censorship that serves for the betterment of the community is a good thing. For some silly reason, I see the parents and the administration trusting each other as a good thing. And I see the school staying in the good eyes of the media as a good thing. You might ask where the students fit in, but as I see it, sometimes students just have to sit back and accept what's going on. Last year there was so much traffic b/c of computer games that the network couldn't be used for work (ie: why it is there at all) and games had to be banned. I was pissed. I liked those games. But then I though about it, and I could actually find a computer to do work on or print out my homework from, and if they hadn't been monitoring that stuff and hadn't banned certain sites, the network would have been unusable to those who needed it for work for the entire fourth quarter. I'm not sure that I totally agree with the censorship; I would have to see what types of sites are being censored. However, it has to be said that the school is trying merely to save themselves a lawsuit, which seems, to me, intelligent. I did hear an idea that I found to be a good one: some sort of waiver. But I have gotten entirely too into this arguement when I at first meant only to present the administration's side of this. Goodnight, Jennifer From tdcallaw@unity.ncsu.edu Mon Sep 25 06:51:36 2000 Date: Mon, 25 Sep 2000 01:51:36 -0400 (EDT) From: spot tdcallaw@unity.ncsu.edu Subject: Student Censorship at NCSSM As always, IANAL, but I've had to ask their council enough for various issues, including NCSSM expulsion hearings, that I'm well versed in the lingo and terminology. On Sun, 24 Sep 2000, Scott Seagroves wrote: > They're really complaining "simply because they are being monitored". > > Ah, and then there's that gem: > "If you are using the network for the purposes intended, why would it even > matter if they were keeping logs of your activity?" > > Do I have to point out the obvious questions of > - who defines the `intended purposes'? > - what are the `intended purposes'? > - who are the `they' who are allowed to monitor? > - who else has access to logs? > - etc. Let me answer Scott's questions. Who defines the intended purposes? That would be the State of North Carolina, in representation of the taxpayers of North Carolina. Since NCSSM is a state funded institution, it acts as a representative of the State of North Carolina, In Loco Parentis, with legal backing from admission forms signed by everyone who attends NCSSM, waiving several notable legal rights. NCSSM, internally, assigns this responsibility to ITS, who operates by committee, and under the guidelines imposed on them by the NCSSM administration and the board of trustees. What are the intended purposes? We can make assumptions to this until the cows come home, but a formal statement from the school will probably be along the lines of "to prevent inappropriate usage and ensure system security". Any systems adminstrator on a large semi-public network will tell you that logging activity is an essential part of the job. Use their network, recognize that there is no privacy inherent in the system. I knew this when I was at NCSSM, theres a reason I did a large amount of email off campus. Who are the `they' who are allowed to monitor? Ideally, the only ones with access to monitor the users on the network would be ITS staff and not workservice students. ITS workservice students changed print cartridges, refilled paper, and tagged broken PCs as "will not be fixed until friday", and were not involved on the administrative level of things (in my day, which is quickly a distant memory). Students have to sign a terms of service agreement to access the network at all (trust me, I had my john hancock waved in my face on more than one occasion) and that TOS states that anything considered inappropriate by ITS/NCSSM administration should not be viewed on the NCSSM network. This TOS should tip students off that this is not an open network, but rather, a closed network that is being monitored. (I wasnt too fond of this fact while there, so I bypassed it, but thats another story altogether) Who else has access to logs? This is something the student body should find out. I would suspect it is simply ITS and NCSSM Administration. Let us be realists for a moment. If you're on the internet, unless you are a top-level service provider, you pay for someone to provide you access. These entities do logging and monitoring. Some of these entities restrict what you can view (AOL Kids, corporate nets). If you dont like this awareness, you can get your internet from someone else, which admittedly, isnt much of an option for NCSSM students. But its along the lines of having no cars at NCSSM, you're going into an environment where the network is monitored and proxied to prevent misuse. If this is just too much to take, hook your PC up to the cell phones which have become super-prominent on campus with their newly found "legality" and get on the net that way. Sacrifice speed for freedom of access. Life is ultimately a tradeoff. Besides, most educational institutions are proxying their networks today. Libraries too. I know that my home school (Northwest Cabarrus) is, as well as the CharMeck library system. Welcome to the real world, ladies and gentlemen, and for most of us, NCSSM was the first taste of it. While I applaud student activism, I fear that their approach is misdirected. Rather than condemning the proxy altogether, they should gather evidence of the proxy's oversensitivity, and request that it be properly leveled. They should find out what is logged, and who has access to the logs. (ps. sorry james, I had to do this.) ~tom "spot" callaway, NCSSM Class of 98 -- one Level 2, NCSSM Network Misuse / Disrespect for Authority :: loss of account for a semester, ~$80 equivalence blacklisting from NCSSM sysadmin positions :: never was sun root, ~$5.25 equivalence, per hour for a year look on ITS admin face when I asked if a hacker was someone who went through the jungle with a big knife :: priceless. From basket@ncssm.edu Mon Sep 25 13:33:58 2000 Date: Mon, 25 Sep 2000 08:33:58 -0400 From: Basket, Warren basket@ncssm.edu Subject: Student Censorship at NCSSM Evan: I support any student effort to question and resolve issues. However, I would hope however that before you mobilize the campus you have taken the time and the courtesy to contact effected individuals about your concerns already. I certainly have not been contacted about this issue. Things are not always as they seem. Many perceived grievances are not and many abuses against students are not. I hope the respect you want for students is also being extended to the adults on campus as well. As one adult who has devoted the better part of the past 20 years to NCSSM ( I have stayed for the students) and I know most other adults are as dedicated also, supporting students has been a priority. I support any student gathering to positively review policies and procedures. I reiterate however, that I hope you have extended the courtesy of contacting some of the listed adults above already for information before mobilizing a community meeting. WHB -----Original Message----- From: Scott, Evan Sent: Friday, September 22, 2000 9:47 PM To: Adamo, Elena; Adkin, Sally; Adnan, Wifag; Agarwal, Ravi; Akinkuotu, Adesola; Alexander, Ashley; Alexander, Nicholas; Allen, Kathleen; Allen, Sarah; Alston, Richard; Alumni; Alumni ListServe; Ambrose, Amber; Amspacher, William; Anagnostou, Alistair; Anasti, Theresa; Anderson, Kristie; Anderson, Misti; Anderson, Phillip; Antony, Ashley; Appler, John; Aravapalli, Amit; Ariail, Laurin; Armitage, Chelsea; Armwood, Ricky; Arrington, Martha; Aswani, Monica; Audish, Michael; Austin, Darryl; Babinec, Katy; Baer, Katherine; Bagley, DeAnna; Baglia, Mark; Baker, G. Mitchell; Balance, Kelsie; Baranpuria, Alex; Barber, Joan; Barber, Kelly; Bare, Daniel; Barefoot, Douglas; Barnes, Letha; Barnett-Robisheaux, Anna; Barrett, Gloria; Basket, Warren; Bauer, Anna; Beasley, Emily; Beers, William; Bellamy, Abby; Bennett, Jonathan; Bernardo, Danilo Jr; Besas, Jaclyn; Bessonov, Mariya; Bethea, Ellena; Biondi, Marisa; Blackwell, Katharine; Blakney, Marlene; Bledsoe, Kenneth; Blose, Emma; Blount, Donald; Boarman, Jerry; Boney, Krystina; Borjas, Kristina; Bouvatte, Robert; Bowick, Debra; Bradshaw, Justin; Bradsher, Delacy; Brady, Melissa; Bridges, Carrie; Bridges, Randi; Brinn, Burnie; Brinson, Leslie; Britton, Chuck; Brockman, Justin; Brockman, Latrice; Brown, Barrett; Brown, Cassidy; Brown, Eric; Brown, Jacquilla; Brown, Terry; Broyles, Elizabeth; Bullard, Floyd; Bullock, Barbara; Bullock, Carla; Burchett, Sean; Burgess, Shawn; Burke, Christopher; Burness, Evan; Burrell, Ollie; Butcher, Steven; Butson, Scott; Butts, Nelson; Butts, Shelia; Bynum, Douglas; Calloway, Katherine; Camacho, Yvonne; Campbell, Gabriel; Cannon, Ann; Canup, Alejandro; Carlton, Hannah; Carroll, Brandon; Carter, James; Carter, Steven; Cates, Frederick; Chan, David; Chan, Michael; Chandler, Emily; Charlton, Mike; Chen, Emery; Chen, Katherine; Chen, Richard; Cheng, Jack; Cheran, Elango; Chesky, Anne; Chester, John; Chester, Tyler; Chhotani, Ali; Childers, David; Childers, Joanna; Choe, Hans; Choi, Jane; Christian, Donald; Christie, Daniel; Church, Ray; Cianci, Christopher; Clapp, Faith; Clapp, Justin; Clark, Dahl; Clark, Pamela; Clayton, Thomas; Clearfield, Christopher; Cluxton, Hadley; Cobb, Daniel; Cobbs, Cassidy; Coleman, Katy; Coletrane, Clinton; Collins, James; Compton, Helen; Copley, Robin; Covington, ShaLeka; Covington, Thomas; Cox, Jonathan; Craft, Peggy; Cromwell, Kevin; Crouse, John; Currie, Kevin; Currin, David; Currin, Elizabeth; Dadok, Alexander; Dallen, Amy; Dangerfield-Persky, Felicia; Daniel, Evan; Daniels, Elizabeth; Dark, Calvin; Davis, Charles; Davis, Erin; Davis, Frank; Davis, Jonathan; DeBest; DeCicco, Jennifer; DeNaro, Deena; Dennis, Eddie; Dickens, Janet; Dietch, Colin; Dingman, Marguerite; Dore, Daniel; Doubek, Mike; Dougherty, Jon-Michael; Douglas, Laura; Doyle, Dot; Drew, Jonathan; Drum, Kristen; Duncan, Mary Kay; Eason, Nicholas; Ediriwickrema, Lilangi; Elliott, Ryan; Elmore, Joshua; English, Alan (Mark); Enstice, Erin; Erb, Christopher; Erickson, Christopher; Erickson, Jessica; Eron, Kathryn; Escutin, Margaux; Evans, Monte; Evers, Pat; Fabricius, Anne; Faircloth, Amanda; Faircloth, Brandon; Faulkner, Shanna; Feng, Hao; Ferguson, Kendra; Fieselman, Laura; Fisher, Megan; Flanagan, Jesse; Fleming, Glenda; Forrest, Joshua; Francis, Sean; Francisco, Megan; Frazier, Andrew; Frega, Carl; Fromson, Kathryn; Fuchs, Annafrancesca; Furgurson, James; Furr, Jessica; Futrelle, Diane; Galgano, Sean-Michael; Gallagher, Emily; Garber, Alan; Garneau, William; Gay, Chris; Gentile, Steven; Gibble, Eric; Gibbs, Kenneth Jr; Gibson, Alexander; Gill, Timothy; Gillespie, Erin; Gilson, Gillian; Godfrey, Heather; Goebel, John; Goon, Monica-Jewell; Gorodezky, Igor; Goulette, Christopher; Grafton, Sean; Grant, Anna; Graves, Julie; Gray, Terry; Green, Eric; Greene, Alexander; Greenfield, Stephen; Gregg, Clifton; Gregory, Hope; Grier, Neva; Griffitt, Anna; Grondin, Julie; Gula, Kurt; Guley, Patrick; Gupta,Sonia; Haber, Kyle; Haddock, Gabrielle; Hadley, Corey; Hager, Allison; Haislip, Lyndsay; Hale, Stephen; Hall, Tyrone; Halpin, Myra; Hammond, Leigha; Hammoudi, Taymour; Han, Kun; Hannen, Alta; Hardin, Charles; Hardin, Holly; Hardison, Meredith; Hardwick, Christopher; Harlow, Tyler; Harrell, John; Harrell, Shelly; Harris, Lincoln Jr (Wesley); Hart, Katie; Harvell, Raymond; Haskell, Hugh; Haverkamp, Jim; Heard, Kimberley; Hebert, Henry; Heenan, Erin; Hegde, Akhil; Heldenbrand, Hugh; Help; Hernandez, Maria; Herzog, Elizabeth; Hess, Richard; Hicks, Marva; Higgins, Katherine; Hill, Brent; Hill, Melissa; Hill, Meredith; Ho, Chung; Hockett, Rhonda; Hodges, Jerome IV; Hoffman, Henry; Holland, Betsy; Holsenbeck, Bryant; Hong, Pauline; Hoopes, Kelly; Hooton, Shawn; Horne, Ken; Houpe, Don; Hudson, Gail; Hudson, Shannon; Huggins, Merri; Hughes, Carol; Hunt, Alina; Hurley, Amanda; Hutchinson, Adrian; Iannacchione, Erin; Irvin, Nathaniel; Jackson, Kathy (SPIRE); Jackson, Robert; Jackson, Sandra; Jailall, Ron; Jamieson-Drake, Rebeccah; Jeng, Lily; Jerch, Michael; Jeuck, Jonathan; Jin, Shauna; Johnson, Bertha; Johnson, Kay; Johnson, Khara; Johnson, Mela; Johnson, Sarah; Jones, Aldric; Jones, Jennifer (Junior); Jones, Jessica (Senior); Jones, Marcus; Jones, Martina; Jordan, Christopher; Kachergis, Emily; Kaelin, Andrea; Kapral, Gary; Kennedy, Molly; Keohane, Jonathan; Kim, Minar; Kim, Yoon-Mi; Kimel, Erin; Kincaid, David; King, Keisha; King, Sabrinia; Kirby, Amber; Kirby, Nigel; Kirchner, Jennifer; Kirk, Peggy; Kithcart, Shaun; Klein, Alexis; Knight, Eric; Knight, Thomas; Kohler, Damon; Kolappa, Kavitha; Kolena, John; Kulkarni, Ashwin; Kulkarni, Nitin; Kumar, Rashmi; Lackey, Lela; Lam, Michael; Lamb, Elizabeth; Lamb, Megan; Land, April; Lasater, Morgan (Audrie); Lawson, James; Leaven, Sheena; Ledford, Tiffany; Lee, Benjamin; Lee, Frederick; Lee, Jennifer (Sr); Lee, Joanne; Lehman, James; Lekwauwa, Ruby; Lester Alston; LeTendre, Zoey; Levenbook, Jennifer; Lewis, Leon; Lewis, Natasha; Li, Sheng; Liles, Joe; Link, Bill; Link, Marilyn; Litle, Jim; Liu, Jerry; Liu, Stephanie; Liu, Tiantian; Livingston, Katharine; Lloyd, Diane; Lockamy, Justin; Lofton, Jordan; Logsdon, Rebecca; Loudermelt, Joy; Love, Kelle; Lovejoy, Sarah; Lowe, Adam; Lunsford, Christopher; Lupton, Dustin; Lutz, Jo Ann; Ly, Anh; Lyon, Brent; Madson, Johan; Magee, Robin; Mahmutefendic, Zinaida; Maidment, Jessica; Maier, Caroline; Makwana, Shreyas; Manickam, Rajesh; Manring, Andres; Manring, Peggy; Manthripragada, Vyjayanthi; Mao, Meng; Mao, Zixuan; Mao, Ziyun; Maradiaga, Gerardo; Marcuard, Natasha; Marsh, Kristen; Martin, Anita; Martin, Heather; Martin, Nicole; Martin, Phyllis; Mason, Letita; Mason, Luther; Matange, Aditya; Mathias, Sonya; Mays, Ashley; McBride, Ed; McBride, Larry; McCall, Frederic; McCallum, Belinda; McCauley, Alexander; McClellan, Matthew; McConnaughey, Adam; McConnaughey, Kenneth; McCormick, Megan; McCoy, Anita; McCoy, Jessica; McCusker, Erin; McDonald, Cam; McDonald, Soraya; McFall, Betsy; McFarland, Jason; McFarland, Karen; McHone, Torie; McKoy, Everette; McNair, Travette; McNair, Walter; McNeil, Vickie; McRae, Elizabeth; McRight, Robert; McSherry, Eileen; McVey, Jamie; Meadows, William; Medina, Rafael; Mehta, Alap; Melling, Christopher; Melvin, Krystle; Mentorship; Messier, Roger; Metcalf, Kasee; Meyer, Allison; Mian, Matthew; Michener, Joshua; Middleton, Amy; Miles, Jadrian; Miller, Jon; Miller, Stephanie; Miller, Thomas; Millman, Jeffrey; Mills, Kelley; Mirovitsky, Dmitry; Mitchell, Mike; Moll, Lori; Monroe, Frances; Moore, Clayton Jr; Moore, Alisha; Moore, Spencer; Moose, Elizabeth; Morano, Christopher; Morris, Ron; Morrison, John; Morrison, Kathryn; Moschler, David; Muehlenbein, Danielle; Mueller, Michael; Muerdter, Hanni; Munroe, Rosemary; Murphy, Kathryn; Myles, Anthony; Naiman, Noreen; Namkoong, Barbara; Nanney, Erinn; Nanney, Lisa; Nazzal, Jim; Neal, Bobbi; Neill, Justin; Neslen, Emily; Netherton, Martin; Newman, Seth; Newnam, Barbara; Nichols, Chris; Nishimura, Mari; Noffsinger, Benjamin; Non-Institutional Parent Listserv at Duke University; Norris, Whitney; Nsien, Ima; O'Dell, Carol; O'Dowd, John; Oettinger, Matthew; Okanlawon, Olutoyn; Olbert, Charles; O'Loughlin, Leslie; Oriaku, Chiduzie; Orr, Tim; Osborne, Allison; Osborne, Megan; Oxendine, Derek; Pace, Tori; Pace, Victor; Page, Monica; Painter, Willie; Palmer, Cristobal; Pandit, Ambareesh; Parent Forum; Parkinson, George; Pasquarello, Nicole; Patel, Amee; Patel, Anjni; Patel, Dimple; Patel, Kirtesh; Patel, Neal; Patel, Nilam; Patel, Ravi; Patrick, Daniel; Patrone, Paul; Patty, Jason; Paul, Christopher; Pearson, Carmen; Peele, Elliot; Penner, Kristen; Perry, Kimberly; Peterson, Nicole; Pettit, Grant; Pezzi, Kathryn; Pham, Bobby; Phillips, Sumner; Phipps, Jessica; Pickett, Dawn; Pickett, Linda; Piergallini, Daniel; Pike, Brian; Pike, Jamie-Ann; Pipe, Laura; Pluta, Timothy; Ponton, Amanda; Poole, Stephanie; Porter, William; Portzer, Jeremy; Powell, Wesley; Powers, Andrew; Powers, Megan; Prajapati, Snehal; Prakash, Rohit; Prater, David; Pratt, Stuart; Price, Jacquelynn; Pridgen, April; Pryor, Gwen; Purdee, Karen; Putnam, Timothy; Quota Server; Radack, Kyle; Rajan, Vignesh; Rankin, Ashley; Rao, Veena; Raper, Pamela; Reece, Bret; Reibold, Timothy; Reid, Anthony; Reid, Roxanne; Reising, Sarah; Rey, Cooper; Rich, Molly; Rich, Stephen; Richardson, Robert; Richardson, Wyatt; Rife, Margaret; Rittiner, Joseph (Joe); Roark, Jessica; Roberson, Sharon; Roberts, Mary; Roberts, Thaddius; Robinson, Donita; Robinson, Russell; Rodgers, Jamarl; Rodman, Joyce; Rogers, Sarah; Rogers, Shelley; Rohrer, Jason; Roofe, Lindsay; Room Listings and Reservations; Roser, Chuck; Rosier, MaryLu; Rothschild, Sandy; Rowell, Joseph; Royals, Carol; Ruddock, Suzanna; Rush, Carl; Ryckman, Heather; Ryu, Junghyun; Sagdejev, Ildar; Saleeby, Jenny; Salter, Phia; Satterfield, Kat; Satz, Brian; Savanna; Scarboro, Benjamin; Scerbo, Siroberto; Schaefer, Kevin; Schlaefer, Peter; Schlesing, Andrew; Schlieper, Richard; Schmalbeck, Linda; Schmeltzle, Shaina; Schnell, Nicholette; Schrey, Hilary; Schulze, Sharon; Schwarz, Jordan; Scivally, Juan; Scott, Evan; Scronce, Gabrielle; Scronce, Guy; Seila, Robin; SGA; Shafer, Paul; Shah, Rickin; Shah, Sejal; Shahid-El, Fatimah; Shahid-El, Laila; Sharma, Krishn; Sharpton, Keith; Shattuck, Scott Jr; Shaver, Tarah; Sheets, Frank; Sherouse, Perry; Shields, Shirley; Shin, Jiyeon; Shinouda, Nancy; Shlensky, Jane; Shoun, Abby; Sikkink, Julie; Silverman, Aaron; Simon, Chelsea; Simpson, Ja'Nelle; Sims, Sophilia; Skidmore, Gretchen; Smith, Avery; Smith, Benjamin; Smith, David; Smith, David (trustee); Smith, Jacqueline A (Jr); Smith, Jacqueline G (Sr); Smith, John L; Smith-Holliman, Tonya; Snyder, Nicholas; Solomon, Isaac; Solomon, Laura; Somerday, Megan; Spielvogel, Ryan; Spivey, Jeremy; Spruill, Willie; Sridhar, Meera; Stackhouse, James; Stadter, Lucia; Stamps, Dennis; Steele, Michael; Steen, Ken; Stein, David; Steinhauer, Adrian; Stern, Carole; Stewart, Douglas; Stewart, Jessica; Stewart, Linwood; Stewart, Margaret; Stowe, David; Stranges, Peter; Strickland, Sarah; Sturgeon, Brad; Suggs, Tonya; Suggs, Trent; Suitt, Linwood; Summerford, Ginger; Tajuddin, Brian; Talley, Allis; Talton, Meredith; Tang, Shan; Taxis, Therese; Taylor, Chris; Taylor, Larry; Teague, Dan; Tedford, Samantha; Terrell, Donny; Thapar, Nidhi; Thompson, Jasmine; Thompson, Mary; Thompson, Russ; Tighe, Bevin; Tillery, Mary; Tingler, Moriah; Titrington, Adam; Treskunov, Denis; Tripp, Buddy; Trocano, Tom; Trott, Alison Carroll; Troxler, JW; Turner, Anne-Marie; Turner, Blair; Turner, Lisa; Tye, Justin; Tyndall, Brandon; Tyson, Julia; Uhing, James; Ulrich, Margaret; Underwood, Alexis; Upchurch, Bob; Upchurch, Mervin; Upchurch, Virginia; Uppal, Abhineet; Vample, Claudine; Varner, Richard; Ventimiglia, Joyce; Vinson, Marc; Vizer, Dustin; Voorhees, Catherine; Voss, Chad; Vu, Quyen; Waghorne, Dick; Wagstaff, Jessica; Wagstaff, Katie; Wahnefried, Nicholas; Waite-Jones, Christopher; Walker, Becky; Wall, Stephanie; Walters, Natalie; Wantuch, Holly; Ward, Aaron; Warren, Ann; Warren, Emily; Warshaw, Steve; Watlington, Katherine; Watson, Danny; Watson, David; Watts, Candis; Watts, Robert; Weed, Brett; Welch, Katherine; Wells, Jonathan; Wentworth, Sean; West, Brett; West, Lindsay; West, Whitney; Westervelt, Amy; White, Cassandra; White, John; White, Joseph; White, Robert; Whitfield, Douglas; Whitlock, Elizabeth; Whitt, Deborah; Wiggins, Rasheed; Williams, Chip; Williams, Joan; Williams, John III; Williams, Kathleen; Williams, LaToya; Williams, Nikolas; Williams, Quanda; Wilson, Erica; Wilson, Ginger; Wilson, Michael; Wilson, Sarah; Wilson-Short, Gareth; Winborne, Angelina; Wingo, Rebecca; Winn, Jonathan; Winterling, Brandon; Winters, Loren; Wise, Aaron; Witt, Eileen; Wong, Caroline; Wong, Jason; Wong, Melody; Woo, Ram; Wood, Trent; Woodmansee, John; Woolard, David; Wrayno, Paul; Wright, Camille; Wright, John; Yerger, Talen; Yockey, Elizabeth; Yoon, Jae-Hoon; Yu, David; Yuan, Derek; Yue, Yuan; Yutzy, Rebeca; Zane, Courtney; Zhang, Yun; Zhou, Mingrui Cc: Olbert, Charles; Sherouse, Perry; Lee, Benjamin; Scronce, Guy; Herzog, Elizabeth; Clearfield, Christopher; Titrington, Adam; Boarman, Jerry; Barber, Joan; Warshaw, Steve; McSherry, Eileen; Clayton, Thomas; Alston, Richard Subject: Student Censorship at NCSSM Dear NCSSM Students and Staff - NCSSM is a community where there supposedly exists a freedom to learn and grow both academically and socially. Being a residential high school, the students supposedly come first, and it is stated that we, the student body, are on the same level as the executive director and board of trustees. Ask yourselves, "is this really the case?" We'll answer for you. It's not. Many of you are disillusioned with the school; many people complain about a multitude of grievances and annoyances, but feel powerless to address these issues. There are systemic problems with student life, a perceived ineffectiveness of student-based groups such as SGA and APC, and bizarre implementations of the judicial code. This is blatantly shown through the recent addition of a "proxy server" and filtration software that monitors and restricts student access to knowledge and information on the internet. Is such a "big brother" approach to student life what is needed at OUR school? It seems to many that this is simply another aspect of a general distrust of students by the administration and student life staffs. Instead of simply complaining about the problem, we consider it necessary to take direct and immediate action against any policy or implemenation that violates the trust between students and adults on campus. As such, we would like to hold a speakout regarding the censorship and distrust of students this Wednesday, September 27th, with the hope of achieving immediate removal of any filtering and logging of students by the ITS staff. Also, we hope that by opening a grassroots line of communication to the administration, student issues can begin to be addressed seriously and effectively. Please come express your views about the community as they relate to student life on Wednesday, September 27th at 6:30 P.M. in the assembly hall. Your presence is needed so that we can stop the censorship and surveillance of students! Thank you for your time. -- The members of AIR: Actively Instigating Reform From school@citynet.net Mon Sep 25 11:51:28 2000 Date: Mon, 25 Sep 2000 06:51:28 -0400 From: Church and School of Wicca school@citynet.net Subject: student activism Hey there all, Since I've been running an alternative (religious freedom) organization, it's nice to see that there is still activism at S&M. Diversity doesn't mean divisiveness. I'm sure there's a way to get to "yes", even if both sides compromise and not everyone is happy. Ultimately, it will probably mean adding a few more pages to the tome that is now the rule book. "In loco parentis" apparently means spending your first year away from home reading this thing now. Thank goodness we were responsible for more rules than we read in the early days. All the best, Jo Frost '87 From Catherine.Hardee@ncmail.net Mon Sep 25 14:52:45 2000 Date: Mon, 25 Sep 2000 09:52:45 -0400 From: Catherine Hardee Catherine.Hardee@ncmail.net Subject: Student Censorship at NCSSM This is a multi-part message in MIME format. --------------3244BF867FDABF4B8DFBC93D Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="------------97B0286DB1721C0A8166B845" --------------97B0286DB1721C0A8166B845 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit I'm not only an alumna of NCSSM, but I'm also an employee of the State of North Carolina. And I'm a taxpayer (and any State of NC employee will tell you we probably pay more in state income taxes than any other group in the state). Speaking from all these perspectives, I'm actually surprised that filtration and proxy hasn't been installed at NCSSM before now. Other state employees have been subject to it ever since we were first granted access to the Internet. The philosophy of the filtration has nothing to do with the people who use the equipment and everything to do with the fact that the State of North Carolina owns the equipment. This is true of the computers, servers, software, etc. at NCSSM. Allowing persons to use State-owned equipment to access questionable sites essentially giving the State's approval for the activities of those sites. Do you really expect the State to condone illegal actions, or actions that go against the public interest? As for pornography: how many of you on this list under the age of 18 have actually seen it? I have, and comparing it with Homer is simply ludicrous. It's better compared with the literature put out by hate groups such as the Aryan Nation. The attitudes shown in this material are certainly demeaning to certain groups (and not just women, either). Do you really expect the State to condone those types of attitudes? I would support a sober, unemotional examination of what exactly is being filtered. But the tone of the original letter suggests that is not going to be the case in the September 27 meeting. Evan, that sort of activity only polarizes groups instead of inviting a common ground. Perhaps a committee, including students and administration, would be a better choice. Just my $0.02 -- Catherine '92 (who recently got the NCSSM'92 vanity plate in North Carolina! bwhahahahaha!) --------------97B0286DB1721C0A8166B845 Content-Type: text/html; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit I'm not only an alumna of NCSSM, but I'm also an employee of the State of North Carolina.  And I'm a taxpayer (and any State of NC employee will tell you we probably pay more in state income taxes than any other group in the state).  Speaking from all these perspectives, I'm actually surprised that filtration and proxy hasn't been installed at NCSSM before now.  Other state employees have been subject to it ever since we were first granted access to the Internet.

The philosophy of the filtration has nothing to do with the people who use the equipment and everything to do with the fact that the State of North Carolina owns the equipment.  This is true of the computers, servers, software, etc. at NCSSM.  Allowing persons to use State-owned equipment to access questionable sites essentially giving the State's approval for the activities of those sites.  Do you really expect the State to condone illegal actions, or actions that go against the public interest?

As for pornography: how many of you on this list under the age of 18 have actually seen it?  I have, and comparing it with Homer is simply ludicrous.  It's better compared with the literature put out by hate groups such as the Aryan Nation.  The attitudes shown in this material are certainly demeaning to certain groups (and not just women, either).  Do you really expect the State to condone those types of attitudes?

I would support a sober, unemotional examination of what exactly is being filtered.  But the tone of the original letter suggests that is not going to be the case in the September 27 meeting.  Evan, that sort of activity only polarizes groups instead of inviting a common ground.

Perhaps a committee, including students and administration, would be a better choice.

Just my $0.02

-- Catherine '92
(who recently got the NCSSM'92 vanity plate in North Carolina!  bwhahahahaha!) --------------97B0286DB1721C0A8166B845-- --------------3244BF867FDABF4B8DFBC93D Content-Type: text/x-vcard; charset=us-ascii; name="Catherine.Hardee.vcf" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Description: Card for Catherine Hardee Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="Catherine.Hardee.vcf" begin:vcard n:Hardee;Catherine C. tel;fax:(919) 715-3853 tel;work:(919) 715-7500 ext. 263 x-mozilla-html:TRUE org:NCDHHS -- Division of Early Intervention & Education version:2.1 email;internet:Catherine.Hardee@ncmail.net title:Benefits Representative adr;quoted-printable:;;2302 Mail Service Center=0D=0A;Raleigh;NC;27699-2302; fn:Catherine C. Hardee end:vcard --------------3244BF867FDABF4B8DFBC93D-- From rbrannon@cortexvision.com Sun Sep 24 22:36:18 2000 Date: Sun, 24 Sep 2000 17:36:18 -0400 From: Rob Brannon/Cortexvision rbrannon@cortexvision.com Subject: Student Censorship at NCSSM Off topic but. . . . Jeffery D. Spaleta on 09/24/2000 17:02:55 wrote: > -jef > > NCSSM '93 3rd West How many people on this list include their floor/hall affiliation in their emails? Now that's hall spirit! Go 3rd West! Back on topic. . . . I think that ! Any who should go themselves. Rob '92 3rd West From jhborwic@unity.ncsu.edu Mon Sep 25 15:53:37 2000 Date: Mon, 25 Sep 2000 10:53:37 -0400 (EDT) From: John Borwick jhborwic@unity.ncsu.edu Subject: Student Censorship at NCSSM -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Mr. Basket and the world at large, Were students contacted about implementing internet filtering? Has the student population been given a chance to speak their mind on the issue and decide for themselves? Because many students at NCSSM are smart enough to circumvent filtering systems, you must have their permission before implementing such systems--and if you have their permission and trust then you might as well not filter web pages. Student input must be obtained before systems are implemented--otherwise they will try to "mobilize the campus" because they feel slandered and intentionally ignored by the administration. I'd be interested to know which software Science & Math is using, specifically, to filter out content. My understanding is that filtering software uses two basic tools: 1. lists of web pages that are banned 2. lists of words/filenames/image specs that should not be used #1 may prevent some material from being shown but it's reactive, not proactive. #1 is also only effective if the web pages listed are banned by people, not robots--otherwise it's likely to be a variant of #2. #2 will filter out pages heavy-handedly. As others have mentioned, programs that filter out "gay" or "lesbian" will filter out "gay rights". Even filtering out "XXX Porn" will filter out this message if posted to an archive, or articles called "XXX Porn is bad". Filtering should especially not be implemented (or if implemented, should be removed) because many students at NCSSM are knowledgable enough to bypass it. People that disagree with the ban could use off-site accounts to email web pages (bypassing #2) or could set up proxy servers with clients that decrypt pages after they're received (#2) or that change banned words to non-banned words (like 's@e@x' vs. 'sex') or muck with the URL to avoid #1 above. I hate to be a radical, but oh well. If any students want to bypass internet filtering just let me know and we'll see if I can set up some scripts for you off site. Just let me know what filtering software S&M is using. John Borwick NC State University Computer Science & English major c/o 1998 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: 2.6.2 iQEVAwUBOc9m9d1z2k2k2NBdAQF8gAgAmpYNvOmQR09Ubk84M4MR7sixboRdkwhI GMhzLmqU5VHp4aK+1KbCEYwFlUwf0FSudsvORmrsIaopldDd+L3TGiMtNL5DSzP3 DRJKYDcH5aHOMQNSjz1QuBpGLUGtS0gETysrVCxQpQTGDAY+17X4VfnJgGNhhxcI vrfS3kBSKIG5gDnwPdt/sWURR0PTzAVDUc8dPy8IIxcTV0kXjavRmRK/Z4eVPMdv 5A2+uLzEZGtmJWuUUweRIsmcAAVm0AxrKZRnq4b/l9IZ/aWC1DSBMV95+zF2I4h6 Jjuylm8Z4TET7mowZT+IUpotjw4Z0UalQZ04S+HNGBkbvfNPM18z5Q== =txAO -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- From eclauset@webslingerZ.com Mon Sep 25 16:00:30 2000 Date: Mon, 25 Sep 2000 11:00:30 -0400 (EDT) From: Ethan eclauset@webslingerZ.com Subject: Student Censorship at NCSSM also http://www.peacefire.com has lots of information on why filtering doesn't work as intended and how to bypass it. does _anyone_ have any facts on what exactly is being filtered? ethan clauset '91 2nd bryan From Catherine.Hardee@ncmail.net Mon Sep 25 16:04:28 2000 Date: Mon, 25 Sep 2000 11:04:28 -0400 From: Catherine Hardee Catherine.Hardee@ncmail.net Subject: Student Censorship at NCSSM This is a multi-part message in MIME format. --------------1808886A4CC8E2D3D75B1096 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit John Borwick wrote: > Were students contacted about implementing internet > filtering? Has the student population been given a chance to speak their > mind on the issue and decide for themselves? I thought NCSSM students didn't pay tuition. I know we certainly didn't when I was there. "He who pays the piper calls the tune." It should be the taxpayers who are represented by the administration, not the students, who make that decision. Sorry to sound establishment oriented (and those of you who know me: QUIT LAUGHING!) but this is reality. > Because many students at > NCSSM are smart enough to circumvent filtering systems, you must have > their permission before implementing such systems--and if you have their > permission and trust then you might as well not filter web pages. This is not a good enough reason to get student permission. I think as a courtesy that the student input should be considered, but ultimately the decision is up to those who have to answer to those who pay the money. --------------1808886A4CC8E2D3D75B1096 Content-Type: text/x-vcard; charset=us-ascii; name="Catherine.Hardee.vcf" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Description: Card for Catherine Hardee Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="Catherine.Hardee.vcf" begin:vcard n:Hardee;Catherine C. tel;fax:(919) 715-3853 tel;work:(919) 715-7500 ext. 263 x-mozilla-html:TRUE org:NCDHHS -- Division of Early Intervention & Education version:2.1 email;internet:Catherine.Hardee@ncmail.net title:Benefits Representative adr;quoted-printable:;;2302 Mail Service Center=0D=0A;Raleigh;NC;27699-2302; fn:Catherine C. Hardee end:vcard --------------1808886A4CC8E2D3D75B1096-- From MrsToast@aol.com Mon Sep 25 16:20:00 2000 Date: Mon, 25 Sep 2000 11:20:00 EDT From: MrsToast@aol.com MrsToast@aol.com Subject: Student Censorship at NCSSM In a message dated 9/25/00 10:55:09 AM Eastern Daylight Time, jhborwic@unity.ncsu.edu writes: > Were students contacted about implementing internet > filtering? Has the student population been given a chance to speak their > mind on the issue and decide for themselves? Because many students at > NCSSM are smart enough to circumvent filtering systems, you must have > their permission before implementing such systems--and if you have their > permission and trust then you might as well not filter web pages. Student > input must be obtained before systems are implemented--otherwise they will > try to "mobilize the campus" because they feel slandered and intentionally > ignored by the administration. I really, really must respond to this. Ask the student's permission to filter porn??????? HELLO?!! Anybody home? The student's, for the most part, are NOT legal adults. Those that are 18 are still bound to the agreements they entered into with the school. The school IS legally responsible to attend to their welfare AND uphold the law. Duh. Do you propose next that the school hold a student vote as to whether Big Macs should be on the menu at the cafeteria breakfast, lunch & dinner? What their curfew & limitations for leaving campus should be? What course of study is required to graduate? Whether they have to go to class at all? (Of course, I held my own private vote on that as a student . . ) I'm not saying that student's shouldn't have a say in anything, and granted, if they want to circumvent filtering, it will happen. Just know that by providing help in that regard, you sir, will be contributing to the commission of a crime. Are you that dedicated to the proposition that under age children MUST have access to porn to live your idealized concept of "freedom?" Perhaps you could start a taxi service from the campus to some tit bars. Melissa Toast Mother of 2, Taxpayer, Enjoyer of Porn From briggs@ninthwonder.com Mon Sep 25 16:23:46 2000 Date: Mon, 25 Sep 2000 11:23:46 -0400 From: Allen Briggs briggs@ninthwonder.com Subject: Student Censorship at NCSSM On Mon, Sep 25, 2000 at 09:52:45AM -0400, Catherine Hardee wrote: > Allowing persons to use State-owned equipment to access questionable sites > essentially giving the State's approval for the activities of those sites. However, once the state starts filtering, they are taking on the responsibility of censorship. Not only getting it right (i.e., not blocking sites/info that you don't want blocked), but also defining what is objectionable. Some people would find anything relating to homosexuals objectionable. By and large, my opinion is that blocking things "to protect people" is a bad idea. Blocking things that are actively hostile (i.e., sources of hacking attempts, sources of excessive bandwidth utilization, etc.) is a different story. The usual arguments apply--if you try to hide things from people, they don't learn how to deal with them and may, in fact, be more inclined to seek out the forbidden... Network monitoring is a fact of life, but I don't expect anyone to examine specific sessions (email, web, ftp, whatever) for content. I do expect basic profiling of traffic and monitoring for suspicious activity (i.e., fingerprints of known hacking techniques, etc.). -allen From edest@mse.ufl.edu Mon Sep 25 15:27:01 2000 Date: Mon, 25 Sep 2000 14:27:01 GMT From: edest@mse.ufl.edu edest@mse.ufl.edu Subject: Student Censorship at NCSSM Although I hate the idea of censorship, what you must remember is that NCSSM and the state can be legally responsible for students' actions while on (and sometimes off) campus. Since most of you are minors, this can create a problem when parents discover that NCSSM has given their minor children access to "bad" sites. Although most NCSSM students consider themselves mature enough to make their own decisions, this doesn't change the fact that in the eyes of most of your parents, the school, and most importantly the courts, you are still minors. In the event of something as tragic as an accident (such as the bomb incident that took the life of the NCSSM alum), if this occurred while a student was at NCSSM, and if student's actions could be traced back to an internet website that was accessed from an NCSSM lab or dorm room, then the school could be (and probably would be) held liable. If I were the administration, I'd censor too. The legal issues are too great to ignore. If I were still a student at NCSSM, I'd be complaining just as much as the students who have been voicing concerns. Both groups have very valid arguments and should be talking to one another regarding this issue. Perhaps a monitored computer lab with no censoring can be established to enable access to good websites that inadvertantly get censored due to the ineffective filtering software. Good luck resolving this issue. Schultz DeStephens c/o 95 >-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > >Mr. Basket and the world at large, > > Were students contacted about implementing internet >filtering? Has the student population been given a chance to speak their >mind on the issue and decide for themselves? Because many students at >NCSSM are smart enough to circumvent filtering systems, you must have >their permission before implementing such systems--and if you have their >permission and trust then you might as well not filter web pages. Student >input must be obtained before systems are implemented--otherwise they will >try to "mobilize the campus" because they feel slandered and intentionally >ignored by the administration. > >I'd be interested to know which software Science & Math is using, >specifically, to filter out content. > >My understanding is that filtering software uses two basic tools: > >1. lists of web pages that are banned >2. lists of words/filenames/image specs that should not be used > >#1 may prevent some material from being shown but it's reactive, not >proactive. #1 is also only effective if the web pages listed are banned >by people, not robots--otherwise it's likely to be a variant of #2. > >#2 will filter out pages heavy-handedly. As others have mentioned, >programs that filter out "gay" or "lesbian" will filter out "gay >rights". Even filtering out "XXX Porn" will filter out this message if >posted to an archive, or articles called "XXX Porn is bad". > >Filtering should especially not be implemented (or if implemented, should >be removed) because many students at NCSSM are knowledgable enough to >bypass it. People that disagree with the ban could use off-site accounts >to email web pages (bypassing #2) or could set up proxy servers with >clients that decrypt pages after they're received (#2) or that change >banned words to non-banned words (like 's@e@x' vs. 'sex') or muck with the >URL to avoid #1 above. > >I hate to be a radical, but oh well. If any students want to bypass >internet filtering just let me know and we'll see if I can set up some >scripts for you off site. Just let me know what filtering software S&M is >using. > >John Borwick >NC State University Computer Science & English major >c/o 1998 > > >-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- >Version: 2.6.2 > >iQEVAwUBOc9m9d1z2k2k2NBdAQF8gAgAmpYNvOmQR09Ubk84M4MR7sixboRdkwhI >GMhzLmqU5VHp4aK+1KbCEYwFlUwf0FSudsvORmrsIaopldDd+L3TGiMtNL5DSzP3 >DRJKYDcH5aHOMQNSjz1QuBpGLUGtS0gETysrVCxQpQTGDAY+17X4VfnJgGNhhxcI >vrfS3kBSKIG5gDnwPdt/sWURR0PTzAVDUc8dPy8IIxcTV0kXjavRmRK/Z4eVPMdv >5A2+uLzEZGtmJWuUUweRIsmcAAVm0AxrKZRnq4b/l9IZ/aWC1DSBMV95+zF2I4h6 >Jjuylm8Z4TET7mowZT+IUpotjw4Z0UalQZ04S+HNGBkbvfNPM18z5Q== >=txAO >-----END PGP SIGNATURE----- > > >_______________________________________________ >NCSSM Alumni Mailing List >alumni@ncssm.net >http://lists.ncssm.net/mailman/listinfo/alumni > > > From tarus@sortova.com Mon Sep 25 16:31:02 2000 Date: Mon, 25 Sep 2000 07:31:02 -0800 (PST) From: Tarus Balog tarus@sortova.com Subject: I'm old (was RE: Student Censorship at NCSSM) Ah, it is so nice to see the list active again. Unfortunately, my reception of some of the traffic was such that I received several messages out of order, but I think I have the gist of everything now. It seems that good ol' S&M is installing a proxy server on campus, which will easily enable the school to track Internet traffic. This has caused a certain group called AIR to get upset, and they have called for sort of a town meeting to discuss the issue. Have I got it right so far? First, proxy servers are not bad things. In many cases they are indispensible for separating private and public networks (this message went through one). As with any centralized bottleneck, their main problem is the speed at which they can handle requests. Second, since all the traffic is going through one machine (or a cluster of machines acting as one) a side benefit is the ability to monitor all of that traffic. Finally, since it is the central point for web traffic, various kinds of traffic can be blocked. After thinking about the issue from many sides, my advice is "get used to it". The students and the faculty of S&M do not directly pay for Internet access. Like the Internet access provided at almost all workplaces these days, the company owns it, and all of the content that passes through it. They can legally read your mail, monitored what web sites you use, and there is little you can do about it as long as they tell you they are or can do it. Don't like it? Get your own access. As far as I know, MindSpring doesn't care if you spend all day at smutpuppy.com as long as you send in your $19.95 a month. When I was at S&M you could get a phone in your room. Problem solved. And please don't bring up the "I pay taxes" thing. By the same reasoning I should be able to tell a policeman to do as I please because "I pay taxes". It doesn't buy you a seat on the Board. I have also heard a lot of talk about the Constitution. Remember that the Constitution has been extremely successful because it is very broad. Courts will come and go that will attempt to clarify a point or two, but luckily the body if not the spirit of the document will remain intact. Free speech does not mean you can yell "fire" in a crowded theatre, and I am also sad to say that all of the rights in that grand document are not fully vested until you are an adult. Whether that is 18 or 21, I'll let the courts decide. What is my solution to the "proxy log" issue? Make the logs public. Put them on a web page. One company I worked at used this tactic and it worked pretty well. It would not censor any content unless it became obvious that the system was being abused. While many would agree that they don't want a public school to have access to penthouse.com, what about the Sport Illustrated swimsuit site? It's a pretty gray area, and in these cases the most effective solution is one that is self-policing. If you are real concerned about your privacy, consider taking steps that bypass who controls the network. One easy method is to use PGP for e-mail. It is free and works with most major mail readers (http://web.mit.edu/network/pgp.html). A few final notes: >>> If you are using the network for the purposes intended, why would it even matter >>> if they were keeping logs of your activity? >> This sort of opinion, particularly the last sentence, scares the hell out of me. > Why does this scare the hell out of you, exactly? I severely dislike it > when people make a statement like that with no reasoning behind it, just an > opinion (a red zinger opinion at that). I guess this is a case of "know your audience". I understood perfectly what was meant, but it obviously missed the mark somewhere. Information is extremely powerful, today more than ever. If you don't care who is looking at your web usage, what about your finances or health records? One thing that is inherent in the Constitution is the right to a reasonable amount of privacy. Roe vs. Wade, one of the most hotly contested decisions ever, was based upon privacy. Ask. Question. It is important and a lackadasical attitude about it is scary. (Now don't try to take the privacy argument and apply it to the proxy server: while one can be naked in one's own house, doing it on a public bus is a different matter. S&M's network is a public bus). On this note I applaud the AIR for questioning the server. Having private logs would create problems. But I have to take off points for their methods. > Ask yourselves, "is this really the case?" > We'll answer for you. It's not. Just as you should question authority, *always* question those who ask you to think and then immediately tell you how to do it. Civil Disobedience is great when all available channels have been exhausted, but otherwise it stands the danger of decending into rhetoric. From Warren's letter it seems that these concerns were not formally brought to the attention of Student Life. Who knows, you may get lucky and get your way without a huge fight. Or you may be able to decide on a compromise. At the very least, if you get no satisfaction you have a flag to rally around. Those who bypass channels in an effort to garner popular support for their "cause" may have another agenda. Anyway, I have droned on long enough. I only wish I knew half of what I thought I knew when I was at S&M. That is not meant as a criticism, only as a charge to hold on to that idealism as long as you can, before it makes you cynical like me. And always remember to think for yourself, it is one thing no one can take away from you. -T From sgcapps@kconline.com Mon Sep 25 17:37:15 2000 Date: Mon, 25 Sep 2000 10:37:15 -0600 From: Susan G. Capps, Ph.D. sgcapps@kconline.com Subject: A request When there's a discussion going on the alumni list, could you pls indicate your graduating class? It would help at least one old fogie (me) keep some of the discussion in perspective. Susan Glass (now Capps) '83 ********************************************** Susan G. Capps, Ph.D. [mailto:sgcapps@kconline.com] BENSOL -- Biological Engineering Solutions P.O. Box 861, Warsaw, IN 46581-0861 "Targeting Your Analysis and Communication Needs" ********************************************** From jgk3@duke.edu Mon Sep 25 16:34:59 2000 Date: Mon, 25 Sep 2000 11:34:59 -0400 (EDT) From: Gray Kimbrough jgk3@duke.edu Subject: Student Censorship at NCSSM On Mon, 25 Sep 2000, Catherine Hardee wrote: > John Borwick wrote: > > > Were students contacted about implementing internet > > filtering? Has the student population been given a chance to speak their > > mind on the issue and decide for themselves? > > I thought NCSSM students didn't pay tuition. I know we certainly didn't when > I was there. "He who pays the piper calls the tune." It should be the > taxpayers who are represented by the administration, not the students, who > make that decision. Sorry to sound establishment oriented (and those of you > who know me: QUIT LAUGHING!) but this is reality. I must say that I don't quite see your point. I've attended public schools all my life, and yet I suppose I expected that the administration cared to some extent about my interests. Maybe that was just me being overly optimistic, but then this begs the question, at what point do I start to matter? If I go to UNC and pay, what, $1500 a year in tuition, does my voice suddenly matter? If I go to Duke and pay $25k in tuition, does my voice matter, or is it still drowned out by money from alums and the endowment and such? Or should I just give up and recognize that I'll never pay enough for my education to drown out the establishment? Quite a few questions, but more like musings, really. I must say that, having been gone all weekend, I was caught off guard by the inbox flood known as the alum list. Anybody have any thoughts on this? --Gray c/o '99 and yes, I already know the answer to that question is yes :-) From campbelm@courant.nyu.edu Mon Sep 25 16:43:55 2000 Date: Mon, 25 Sep 2000 11:43:55 -0400 (EDT) From: Mary Campbell campbelm@courant.nyu.edu Subject: censorship brouhaha I need to know some info about the people running the NCSSM network -- are they very skilled at this job? (I can't imagine NCSSM can afford to pay a competent sys admin.) Because they're going to have a hell of a time keeping controls on current students who really want to get at "smut". I see this censorship issue not so much a blow against student rights but as an insult to the intelligence of current students. Or perhaps the administration really wants students to develop new hacking tools? I mean, many of my friends learned all sorts of nifty things with our mini-UNIX network. I remember learning how to send anonymous email (something that had a practical application =just=once= ... when a certain somebody was saving hot n spicy emails w/o protection... =ahem=) In any case, I wonder what filtering software they plan to use. Something that works by site name? Well, of course, there are easy ways to get around that. Something that works by keywords? Well, how are pictures handled? And then, we know all the infamous stories of breast cancer support groups being blocked by keyword filtering (And my favorite bible verse "We have a little sister and she has no breasts" would also be blocked. My lord, what a nasty work the Bible is! Public execution, people stoned to death or ripped to shreds, incest, rape, fratricide, genocide, human sacrifice... I could go on... but I digress.) I'm just wondering who will be in charge of this selectivity. I'm really reminded of the most effective birth control -- abstinence. If they don't want any students accessing porn online, they could just loose the internet connection. It's all a matter of priorities. mp '92 -- 3rd Beall -- Marlene Now and Forever! ;) -- Mary Pat Campbell I am woman; open the door. campbelm@cims.nyu.edu http://www.math.nyu.edu/phd_students/campbelm/index.html CLAIMER: I speak for everyone, everywhere! mwa ha ha ha ha From barber@ncssm.edu Mon Sep 25 16:41:47 2000 Date: Mon, 25 Sep 2000 11:41:47 -0400 From: Barber, Joan barber@ncssm.edu Subject: Student Censorship at NCSSM Thanks. Your e-mail was informative. However, when I read it, I was surprised because I had not received complaints from students regarding censorship and other issues. I look forward to meeting anytime today (Monday, September 25, 2000) or any other day with students to address these issues. This will give us an opportunity to first identify student issues, share with you some of our interests and work together for solutions. The Student Life Division is determined to stay focused and demonstrate on a daily basis that our students' quality of life here at NCSSM is our top priority. Clearly there is an issue and we (students, faculty, staff, administration, parents) together can find a solution. My door will be open all day, so students, please feel free to come and tell me what's on your minds. > -----Original Message----- > From: Scott, Evan > Sent: Friday, September 22, 2000 9:47 PM > To: Adamo, Elena; Adkin, Sally; Adnan, Wifag; Agarwal, Ravi; Akinkuotu, > Adesola; Alexander, Ashley; Alexander, Nicholas; Allen, Kathleen; Allen, > Sarah; Alston, Richard; Alumni; Alumni ListServe; Ambrose, Amber; > Amspacher, William; Anagnostou, Alistair; Anasti, Theresa; Anderson, > Kristie; Anderson, Misti; Anderson, Phillip; Antony, Ashley; Appler, John; > Aravapalli, Amit; Ariail, Laurin; Armitage, Chelsea; Armwood, Ricky; > Arrington, Martha; Aswani, Monica; Audish, Michael; Austin, Darryl; > Babinec, Katy; Baer, Katherine; Bagley, DeAnna; Baglia, Mark; Baker, G. > Mitchell; Balance, Kelsie; Baranpuria, Alex; Barber, Joan; Barber, Kelly; > Bare, Daniel; Barefoot, Douglas; Barnes, Letha; Barnett-Robisheaux, Anna; > Barrett, Gloria; Basket, Warren; Bauer, Anna; Beasley, Emily; Beers, > William; Bellamy, Abby; Bennett, Jonathan; Bernardo, Danilo Jr; Besas, > Jaclyn; Bessonov, Mariya; Bethea, Ellena; Biondi, Marisa; Blackwell, > Katharine; Blakney, Marlene; Bledsoe, Kenneth; Blose, Emma; Blount, > Donald; Boarman, Jerry; Boney, Krystina; Borjas, Kristina; Bouvatte, > Robert; Bowick, Debra; Bradshaw, Justin; Bradsher, Delacy; Brady, Melissa; > Bridges, Carrie; Bridges, Randi; Brinn, Burnie; Brinson, Leslie; Britton, > Chuck; Brockman, Justin; Brockman, Latrice; Brown, Barrett; Brown, > Cassidy; Brown, Eric; Brown, Jacquilla; Brown, Terry; Broyles, Elizabeth; > Bullard, Floyd; Bullock, Barbara; Bullock, Carla; Burchett, Sean; Burgess, > Shawn; Burke, Christopher; Burness, Evan; Burrell, Ollie; Butcher, Steven; > Butson, Scott; Butts, Nelson; Butts, Shelia; Bynum, Douglas; Calloway, > Katherine; Camacho, Yvonne; Campbell, Gabriel; Cannon, Ann; Canup, > Alejandro; Carlton, Hannah; Carroll, Brandon; Carter, James; Carter, > Steven; Cates, Frederick; Chan, David; Chan, Michael; Chandler, Emily; > Charlton, Mike; Chen, Emery; Chen, Katherine; Chen, Richard; Cheng, Jack; > Cheran, Elango; Chesky, Anne; Chester, John; Chester, Tyler; Chhotani, > Ali; Childers, David; Childers, Joanna; Choe, Hans; Choi, Jane; Christian, > Donald; Christie, Daniel; Church, Ray; Cianci, Christopher; Clapp, Faith; > Clapp, Justin; Clark, Dahl; Clark, Pamela; Clayton, Thomas; Clearfield, > Christopher; Cluxton, Hadley; Cobb, Daniel; Cobbs, Cassidy; Coleman, Katy; > Coletrane, Clinton; Collins, James; Compton, Helen; Copley, Robin; > Covington, ShaLeka; Covington, Thomas; Cox, Jonathan; Craft, Peggy; > Cromwell, Kevin; Crouse, John; Currie, Kevin; Currin, David; Currin, > Elizabeth; Dadok, Alexander; Dallen, Amy; Dangerfield-Persky, Felicia; > Daniel, Evan; Daniels, Elizabeth; Dark, Calvin; Davis, Charles; Davis, > Erin; Davis, Frank; Davis, Jonathan; DeBest; DeCicco, Jennifer; DeNaro, > Deena; Dennis, Eddie; Dickens, Janet; Dietch, Colin; Dingman, Marguerite; > Dore, Daniel; Doubek, Mike; Dougherty, Jon-Michael; Douglas, Laura; Doyle, > Dot; Drew, Jonathan; Drum, Kristen; Duncan, Mary Kay; Eason, Nicholas; > Ediriwickrema, Lilangi; Elliott, Ryan; Elmore, Joshua; English, Alan > (Mark); Enstice, Erin; Erb, Christopher; Erickson, Christopher; Erickson, > Jessica; Eron, Kathryn; Escutin, Margaux; Evans, Monte; Evers, Pat; > Fabricius, Anne; Faircloth, Amanda; Faircloth, Brandon; Faulkner, Shanna; > Feng, Hao; Ferguson, Kendra; Fieselman, Laura; Fisher, Megan; Flanagan, > Jesse; Fleming, Glenda; Forrest, Joshua; Francis, Sean; Francisco, Megan; > Frazier, Andrew; Frega, Carl; Fromson, Kathryn; Fuchs, Annafrancesca; > Furgurson, James; Furr, Jessica; Futrelle, Diane; Galgano, Sean-Michael; > Gallagher, Emily; Garber, Alan; Garneau, William; Gay, Chris; Gentile, > Steven; Gibble, Eric; Gibbs, Kenneth Jr; Gibson, Alexander; Gill, Timothy; > Gillespie, Erin; Gilson, Gillian; Godfrey, Heather; Goebel, John; Goon, > Monica-Jewell; Gorodezky, Igor; Goulette, Christopher; Grafton, Sean; > Grant, Anna; Graves, Julie; Gray, Terry; Green, Eric; Greene, Alexander; > Greenfield, Stephen; Gregg, Clifton; Gregory, Hope; Grier, Neva; Griffitt, > Anna; Grondin, Julie; Gula, Kurt; Guley, Patrick; Gupta,Sonia; Haber, > Kyle; Haddock, Gabrielle; Hadley, Corey; Hager, Allison; Haislip, Lyndsay; > Hale, Stephen; Hall, Tyrone; Halpin, Myra; Hammond, Leigha; Hammoudi, > Taymour; Han, Kun; Hannen, Alta; Hardin, Charles; Hardin, Holly; Hardison, > Meredith; Hardwick, Christopher; Harlow, Tyler; Harrell, John; Harrell, > Shelly; Harris, Lincoln Jr (Wesley); Hart, Katie; Harvell, Raymond; > Haskell, Hugh; Haverkamp, Jim; Heard, Kimberley; Hebert, Henry; Heenan, > Erin; Hegde, Akhil; Heldenbrand, Hugh; Help; Hernandez, Maria; Herzog, > Elizabeth; Hess, Richard; Hicks, Marva; Higgins, Katherine; Hill, Brent; > Hill, Melissa; Hill, Meredith; Ho, Chung; Hockett, Rhonda; Hodges, Jerome > IV; Hoffman, Henry; Holland, Betsy; Holsenbeck, Bryant; Hong, Pauline; > Hoopes, Kelly; Hooton, Shawn; Horne, Ken; Houpe, Don; Hudson, Gail; > Hudson, Shannon; Huggins, Merri; Hughes, Carol; Hunt, Alina; Hurley, > Amanda; Hutchinson, Adrian; Iannacchione, Erin; Irvin, Nathaniel; Jackson, > Kathy (SPIRE); Jackson, Robert; Jackson, Sandra; Jailall, Ron; > Jamieson-Drake, Rebeccah; Jeng, Lily; Jerch, Michael; Jeuck, Jonathan; > Jin, Shauna; Johnson, Bertha; Johnson, Kay; Johnson, Khara; Johnson, Mela; > Johnson, Sarah; Jones, Aldric; Jones, Jennifer (Junior); Jones, Jessica > (Senior); Jones, Marcus; Jones, Martina; Jordan, Christopher; Kachergis, > Emily; Kaelin, Andrea; Kapral, Gary; Kennedy, Molly; Keohane, Jonathan; > Kim, Minar; Kim, Yoon-Mi; Kimel, Erin; Kincaid, David; King, Keisha; King, > Sabrinia; Kirby, Amber; Kirby, Nigel; Kirchner, Jennifer; Kirk, Peggy; > Kithcart, Shaun; Klein, Alexis; Knight, Eric; Knight, Thomas; Kohler, > Damon; Kolappa, Kavitha; Kolena, John; Kulkarni, Ashwin; Kulkarni, Nitin; > Kumar, Rashmi; Lackey, Lela; Lam, Michael; Lamb, Elizabeth; Lamb, Megan; > Land, April; Lasater, Morgan (Audrie); Lawson, James; Leaven, Sheena; > Ledford, Tiffany; Lee, Benjamin; Lee, Frederick; Lee, Jennifer (Sr); Lee, > Joanne; Lehman, James; Lekwauwa, Ruby; Lester Alston; LeTendre, Zoey; > Levenbook, Jennifer; Lewis, Leon; Lewis, Natasha; Li, Sheng; Liles, Joe; > Link, Bill; Link, Marilyn; Litle, Jim; Liu, Jerry; Liu, Stephanie; Liu, > Tiantian; Livingston, Katharine; Lloyd, Diane; Lockamy, Justin; Lofton, > Jordan; Logsdon, Rebecca; Loudermelt, Joy; Love, Kelle; Lovejoy, Sarah; > Lowe, Adam; Lunsford, Christopher; Lupton, Dustin; Lutz, Jo Ann; Ly, Anh; > Lyon, Brent; Madson, Johan; Magee, Robin; Mahmutefendic, Zinaida; > Maidment, Jessica; Maier, Caroline; Makwana, Shreyas; Manickam, Rajesh; > Manring, Andres; Manring, Peggy; Manthripragada, Vyjayanthi; Mao, Meng; > Mao, Zixuan; Mao, Ziyun; Maradiaga, Gerardo; Marcuard, Natasha; Marsh, > Kristen; Martin, Anita; Martin, Heather; Martin, Nicole; Martin, Phyllis; > Mason, Letita; Mason, Luther; Matange, Aditya; Mathias, Sonya; Mays, > Ashley; McBride, Ed; McBride, Larry; McCall, Frederic; McCallum, Belinda; > McCauley, Alexander; McClellan, Matthew; McConnaughey, Adam; McConnaughey, > Kenneth; McCormick, Megan; McCoy, Anita; McCoy, Jessica; McCusker, Erin; > McDonald, Cam; McDonald, Soraya; McFall, Betsy; McFarland, Jason; > McFarland, Karen; McHone, Torie; McKoy, Everette; McNair, Travette; > McNair, Walter; McNeil, Vickie; McRae, Elizabeth; McRight, Robert; > McSherry, Eileen; McVey, Jamie; Meadows, William; Medina, Rafael; Mehta, > Alap; Melling, Christopher; Melvin, Krystle; Mentorship; Messier, Roger; > Metcalf, Kasee; Meyer, Allison; Mian, Matthew; Michener, Joshua; > Middleton, Amy; Miles, Jadrian; Miller, Jon; Miller, Stephanie; Miller, > Thomas; Millman, Jeffrey; Mills, Kelley; Mirovitsky, Dmitry; Mitchell, > Mike; Moll, Lori; Monroe, Frances; Moore, Clayton Jr; Moore, Alisha; > Moore, Spencer; Moose, Elizabeth; Morano, Christopher; Morris, Ron; > Morrison, John; Morrison, Kathryn; Moschler, David; Muehlenbein, Danielle; > Mueller, Michael; Muerdter, Hanni; Munroe, Rosemary; Murphy, Kathryn; > Myles, Anthony; Naiman, Noreen; Namkoong, Barbara; Nanney, Erinn; Nanney, > Lisa; Nazzal, Jim; Neal, Bobbi; Neill, Justin; Neslen, Emily; Netherton, > Martin; Newman, Seth; Newnam, Barbara; Nichols, Chris; Nishimura, Mari; > Noffsinger, Benjamin; Non-Institutional Parent Listserv at Duke > University; Norris, Whitney; Nsien, Ima; O'Dell, Carol; O'Dowd, John; > Oettinger, Matthew; Okanlawon, Olutoyn; Olbert, Charles; O'Loughlin, > Leslie; Oriaku, Chiduzie; Orr, Tim; Osborne, Allison; Osborne, Megan; > Oxendine, Derek; Pace, Tori; Pace, Victor; Page, Monica; Painter, Willie; > Palmer, Cristobal; Pandit, Ambareesh; Parent Forum; Parkinson, George; > Pasquarello, Nicole; Patel, Amee; Patel, Anjni; Patel, Dimple; Patel, > Kirtesh; Patel, Neal; Patel, Nilam; Patel, Ravi; Patrick, Daniel; Patrone, > Paul; Patty, Jason; Paul, Christopher; Pearson, Carmen; Peele, Elliot; > Penner, Kristen; Perry, Kimberly; Peterson, Nicole; Pettit, Grant; Pezzi, > Kathryn; Pham, Bobby; Phillips, Sumner; Phipps, Jessica; Pickett, Dawn; > Pickett, Linda; Piergallini, Daniel; Pike, Brian; Pike, Jamie-Ann; Pipe, > Laura; Pluta, Timothy; Ponton, Amanda; Poole, Stephanie; Porter, William; > Portzer, Jeremy; Powell, Wesley; Powers, Andrew; Powers, Megan; Prajapati, > Snehal; Prakash, Rohit; Prater, David; Pratt, Stuart; Price, Jacquelynn; > Pridgen, April; Pryor, Gwen; Purdee, Karen; Putnam, Timothy; Quota Server; > Radack, Kyle; Rajan, Vignesh; Rankin, Ashley; Rao, Veena; Raper, Pamela; > Reece, Bret; Reibold, Timothy; Reid, Anthony; Reid, Roxanne; Reising, > Sarah; Rey, Cooper; Rich, Molly; Rich, Stephen; Richardson, Robert; > Richardson, Wyatt; Rife, Margaret; Rittiner, Joseph (Joe); Roark, Jessica; > Roberson, Sharon; Roberts, Mary; Roberts, Thaddius; Robinson, Donita; > Robinson, Russell; Rodgers, Jamarl; Rodman, Joyce; Rogers, Sarah; Rogers, > Shelley; Rohrer, Jason; Roofe, Lindsay; Room Listings and Reservations; > Roser, Chuck; Rosier, MaryLu; Rothschild, Sandy; Rowell, Joseph; Royals, > Carol; Ruddock, Suzanna; Rush, Carl; Ryckman, Heather; Ryu, Junghyun; > Sagdejev, Ildar; Saleeby, Jenny; Salter, Phia; Satterfield, Kat; Satz, > Brian; Savanna; Scarboro, Benjamin; Scerbo, Siroberto; Schaefer, Kevin; > Schlaefer, Peter; Schlesing, Andrew; Schlieper, Richard; Schmalbeck, > Linda; Schmeltzle, Shaina; Schnell, Nicholette; Schrey, Hilary; Schulze, > Sharon; Schwarz, Jordan; Scivally, Juan; Scott, Evan; Scronce, Gabrielle; > Scronce, Guy; Seila, Robin; SGA; Shafer, Paul; Shah, Rickin; Shah, Sejal; > Shahid-El, Fatimah; Shahid-El, Laila; Sharma, Krishn; Sharpton, Keith; > Shattuck, Scott Jr; Shaver, Tarah; Sheets, Frank; Sherouse, Perry; > Shields, Shirley; Shin, Jiyeon; Shinouda, Nancy; Shlensky, Jane; Shoun, > Abby; Sikkink, Julie; Silverman, Aaron; Simon, Chelsea; Simpson, Ja'Nelle; > Sims, Sophilia; Skidmore, Gretchen; Smith, Avery; Smith, Benjamin; Smith, > David; Smith, David (trustee); Smith, Jacqueline A (Jr); Smith, Jacqueline > G (Sr); Smith, John L; Smith-Holliman, Tonya; Snyder, Nicholas; Solomon, > Isaac; Solomon, Laura; Somerday, Megan; Spielvogel, Ryan; Spivey, Jeremy; > Spruill, Willie; Sridhar, Meera; Stackhouse, James; Stadter, Lucia; > Stamps, Dennis; Steele, Michael; Steen, Ken; Stein, David; Steinhauer, > Adrian; Stern, Carole; Stewart, Douglas; Stewart, Jessica; Stewart, > Linwood; Stewart, Margaret; Stowe, David; Stranges, Peter; Strickland, > Sarah; Sturgeon, Brad; Suggs, Tonya; Suggs, Trent; Suitt, Linwood; > Summerford, Ginger; Tajuddin, Brian; Talley, Allis; Talton, Meredith; > Tang, Shan; Taxis, Therese; Taylor, Chris; Taylor, Larry; Teague, Dan; > Tedford, Samantha; Terrell, Donny; Thapar, Nidhi; Thompson, Jasmine; > Thompson, Mary; Thompson, Russ; Tighe, Bevin; Tillery, Mary; Tingler, > Moriah; Titrington, Adam; Treskunov, Denis; Tripp, Buddy; Trocano, Tom; > Trott, Alison Carroll; Troxler, JW; Turner, Anne-Marie; Turner, Blair; > Turner, Lisa; Tye, Justin; Tyndall, Brandon; Tyson, Julia; Uhing, James; > Ulrich, Margaret; Underwood, Alexis; Upchurch, Bob; Upchurch, Mervin; > Upchurch, Virginia; Uppal, Abhineet; Vample, Claudine; Varner, Richard; > Ventimiglia, Joyce; Vinson, Marc; Vizer, Dustin; Voorhees, Catherine; > Voss, Chad; Vu, Quyen; Waghorne, Dick; Wagstaff, Jessica; Wagstaff, Katie; > Wahnefried, Nicholas; Waite-Jones, Christopher; Walker, Becky; Wall, > Stephanie; Walters, Natalie; Wantuch, Holly; Ward, Aaron; Warren, Ann; > Warren, Emily; Warshaw, Steve; Watlington, Katherine; Watson, Danny; > Watson, David; Watts, Candis; Watts, Robert; Weed, Brett; Welch, > Katherine; Wells, Jonathan; Wentworth, Sean; West, Brett; West, Lindsay; > West, Whitney; Westervelt, Amy; White, Cassandra; White, John; White, > Joseph; White, Robert; Whitfield, Douglas; Whitlock, Elizabeth; Whitt, > Deborah; Wiggins, Rasheed; Williams, Chip; Williams, Joan; Williams, John > III; Williams, Kathleen; Williams, LaToya; Williams, Nikolas; Williams, > Quanda; Wilson, Erica; Wilson, Ginger; Wilson, Michael; Wilson, Sarah; > Wilson-Short, Gareth; Winborne, Angelina; Wingo, Rebecca; Winn, Jonathan; > Winterling, Brandon; Winters, Loren; Wise, Aaron; Witt, Eileen; Wong, > Caroline; Wong, Jason; Wong, Melody; Woo, Ram; Wood, Trent; Woodmansee, > John; Woolard, David; Wrayno, Paul; Wright, Camille; Wright, John; Yerger, > Talen; Yockey, Elizabeth; Yoon, Jae-Hoon; Yu, David; Yuan, Derek; Yue, > Yuan; Yutzy, Rebeca; Zane, Courtney; Zhang, Yun; Zhou, Mingrui > Cc: Olbert, Charles; Sherouse, Perry; Lee, Benjamin; Scronce, Guy; > Herzog, Elizabeth; Clearfield, Christopher; Titrington, Adam; Boarman, > Jerry; Barber, Joan; Warshaw, Steve; McSherry, Eileen; Clayton, Thomas; > Alston, Richard > Subject: Student Censorship at NCSSM > > Dear NCSSM Students and Staff - > > NCSSM is a community where there supposedly exists a freedom to > learn and grow both academically and socially. Being a residential high > school, the students supposedly come first, and it is stated that we, the > student body, are on the same level as the executive director and board of > trustees. Ask yourselves, "is this really the case?" We'll answer for > you. It's not. > > Many of you are disillusioned with the school; many people complain > about a multitude of grievances and annoyances, but feel powerless to > address these issues. There are systemic problems with student life, a > perceived ineffectiveness of student-based groups such as SGA and APC, and > bizarre implementations of the judicial code. This is blatantly shown > through the recent addition of a "proxy server" and filtration software > that monitors and restricts student access to knowledge and information on > the internet. Is such a "big brother" approach to student life what is > needed at OUR school? It seems to many that this is simply another aspect > of a general distrust of students by the administration and student life > staffs. > > Instead of simply complaining about the problem, we consider it > necessary to take direct and immediate action against any policy or > implemenation that violates the trust between students and adults on > campus. As such, we would like to hold a speakout regarding the > censorship and distrust of students this Wednesday, September 27th, with > the hope of achieving immediate removal of any filtering and logging of > students by the ITS staff. Also, we hope that by opening a grassroots > line of communication to the administration, student issues can begin to > be addressed seriously and effectively. > > Please come express your views about the community as they relate to > student life on Wednesday, September 27th at 6:30 P.M. in the assembly > hall. Your presence is needed so that we can stop the censorship and > surveillance of students! Thank you for your time. > > -- The members of AIR: Actively Instigating Reform From campbelm@courant.nyu.edu Mon Sep 25 16:54:25 2000 Date: Mon, 25 Sep 2000 11:54:25 -0400 (EDT) From: Mary Campbell campbelm@courant.nyu.edu Subject: censorship brouhaha pt. 2 oops, I'm sorry, I see that it's not filtering software but a proxy server. Still, there are plenty of ways to get what you want without the powers-that-be knowing what you're getting. And of course, they don't really have the time to spend checking out everything the students look at. Things will fall through the cracks. Again, I don't think this will have much impact other than the students who want to get illegal stuff (or, at least, highly suspect) will be sneakier. and good for them. Every generation of teens need to learn how to subvert authority on their own. Now that I've been an authority figure, I know many ways that kids can subvert me, but =I'm= certainly not going to tell them how. It's for them to figure it out. I didn't even tell my younger sisters how to sneak candy up into their rooms (or how to steal each other's candy... didn't they =know= why I counted every piece of my Easter haul?) So, if I were a student at S&M now, I wouldn't make too much of a fuss (well, make a little... otherwise, the adults will get suspicious). You're not going to be able to change much in how the system is run -- you simply do not hold the power. And beyond this, I'm not saying another word. Figure it out for yourself. mp -- Mary Pat Campbell I am woman; open the door. campbelm@cims.nyu.edu http://www.math.nyu.edu/phd_students/campbelm/index.html CLAIMER: I speak for everyone, everywhere! mwa ha ha ha ha From jspaleta@Princeton.EDU Mon Sep 25 17:02:13 2000 Date: Mon, 25 Sep 2000 12:02:13 -0400 (EDT) From: Jeffrey D. Spaleta jspaleta@Princeton.EDU Subject: Student Censorship at NCSSM Well it seems there are two issues here. Active filtering: Information is block before it is viewed. and passive session monitoring: Logging of session information to keep tabs of information as it is viewed. I'm confused as to which is going on. Until I know more specifics about what the school is using there is nothing contructive left for me to say here. Yes, the school has a legal duty to protect students, but active filtering does not work as advertised and its a poor solution(false negatives and false positives are common). In any case it looks like I have a reason to re-setup my anonymous proxy web server so NCSSM students can get access to some "blocked" sites. I encourage current NCSSM students to get in touch with me if they are interested in using my server to get around the censorship. I also encourage other NCSSM alums to set-up their own anonymous proxy's if they feel that active filtering/monitoring is not in the best interest of the NCSSM community. It's easy to add a block for my site if the admins find out about it, but if there were several people running servers it gets much harder for the computer admins to keep up and block them all. Peacefire.org also has a wonderful section on how to get around a lot of censoreware products....the only problem is peacefire.org tends to be censored. Well that's it. On one final note its nice to see the list used for something thought provoking, instead of random spammage. NCSSM is in a rather unique and hairy situation here. I'm very suprised they are even considering dormnet access. -jef"more hall spirit than you can shake a stick at"spaleta '93 3rd West From Catherine.Hardee@ncmail.net Mon Sep 25 17:02:31 2000 Date: Mon, 25 Sep 2000 12:02:31 -0400 From: Catherine Hardee Catherine.Hardee@ncmail.net Subject: [Fwd: Re: censorship brouhaha] I really need to learn the difference between "reply" and "reply all." --Catherine '92 -------- Original Message -------- Su